Federal contractor · BOHEMIA, NY

APEX SIGNAL CORP

No contract obligations recorded for APEX SIGNAL CORP in FY2026. Since FY2017: $24.4K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
VJNCPRK1RX95
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the NORTH ATLANTIC INDUSTRIES, INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $73.1K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. NORTH ATLANTIC INDUSTRIES, INC.BOHEMIA, NY · Family page
    $73.1K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 33.9KFY2017
  2. -6.2KFY2018
  3. -3.8KFY2019
  4. 2.7KFY2020
  5. -2.2KFY2021

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for APEX SIGNAL CORP in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

22 companies · $135.7M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 32 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 72 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 111 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ISOTECH NORTH AMERICA INC$6.3M−95% in FY2026
    COLCHESTER, VT · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. RFHIC US CORP$3.9M−100% in FY2026
    MORRISVILLE, NC · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS$6.5M−81% in FY2026
    SANTA ANA, CA · 2 entities · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.