Federal contractor · MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

APPLIED INTUITION, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for APPLIED INTUITION, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2022: $1.2M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
H7TTMDDHPN23
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the APPLIED INTUITION GOVERNMENT INC company family: 2 registered entities, $500 in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. APPLIED INTUITION GOVERNMENT INCARLINGTON, VA · Family page
    $500

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2022
  2. 1KFY2023
  3. 0FY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for APPLIED INTUITION, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $20M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $11.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $38.3M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$33.4M
    GROTON, CT · 4 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$4.1M
    MCLEAN, VA · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$604K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EBASE, LLC$1.8M
    STERLING, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. ATHENIUM LLC$1.9M
    DOVER, NH · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. ALBEDO SPACE CORP.$1.9M−100% in FY2026
    BROOMFIELD, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of APPLIED INTUITION GOVERNMENT INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • APPLIED INTUITION, INC.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$910K
22 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.5M
$2.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$189.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$600K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$550K
    14 reports
  3. 2025$910K
    22 reports
  4. 2026$440K
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations57 reports
  2. Defense28 reports
  3. Transportation8 reports
  4. Aviation, aircraft and airlines2 reports
  5. Aerospace1 reports
  6. Agriculture1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE57 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES52 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)16 reports
  4. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)9 reports
  5. White House Office7 reports
  6. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)5 reports
  7. Air Force - Dept of2 reports
  8. Natl Security Council (NSC)2 reports
  9. Office of Management & Budget (OMB)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$490K
    9 reports
  2. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$420K
    8 reports
  3. Venable LLP$320K
    8 reports
  4. CANFIELD CONSULTING, LLC$130K
    5 reports
  5. ATS Communications, inc. (DBA Silbey Strategies)$120K
    6 reports
  6. AUBREY MATURIN LLC$120K
    6 reports
  7. GUIDEPOSTSTRATEGIES, LLC$100K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$105K55%
  2. Democratic$84.5K45%

PACs sponsored

  • APPLIED INTUITION, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (APPLIED PAC)$270K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.