Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. received $5.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−65% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $112.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($5.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Y6PJGNW5Q7S8
Small business8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 341KFY2017
  2. 288.9KFY2018
  3. 1.3MFY2019
  4. 8.1MFY2020
  5. 8MFY2021
  6. 5.9MFY2022
  7. 37.2MFY2023
  8. 28.4MFY2024
  9. 17MFY2025
  10. 5.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$5.9M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Madison County, AL$5.9M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. BASE AWARD FOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT OF UTILITY HELICOPTERS PROJECT OFFICE (UHPO).$13.1M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Oct 13, 2022 – May 19, 2026· W31P4Q23FE001
  2. EXPRESS TASK ORDER AWARD FOR PROGRAMMATIC SERVICE SUPPORT FOR THE AVIATION MISSION SYSTEMS AND ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM OFFICE.$7.5M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jul 20, 2020 – Feb 10, 2026· W31P4Q20FD002
  3. TASK ORDER FOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CH- 47 CARGO HELICOPTER PROJECT OFFICE.$5.5M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Feb 18, 2020 – May 22, 2026· W31P4Q20FE001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $10.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $932.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $507K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $14.9M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$7.7M
    HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. CANVAS II, LLC$5.7M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.5M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 24 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC$68.8M+17% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. DYNAMIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.$40.6M−64% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BOWHEAD LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, LLC$57.8M−90% in FY2026
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.