Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC

TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC received $511.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 24 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.3B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($336.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$511.5M
New awards
24
Sole-source
1.9%
Single offer
13%
UEI
YA63J5PVEZE6
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $511.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INCHUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page
    $511.5M
  2. NLOGIC, LLCHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $500

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 343MFY2017
  2. 408.4MFY2018
  3. 504.2MFY2019
  4. 533.5MFY2020
  5. 470.2MFY2021
  6. 588.8MFY2022
  7. 674MFY2023
  8. 629.5MFY2024
  9. 686.7MFY2025
  10. 511.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$336.7M66%
    15 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$161.4M32%
    5 awards
  3. Federal Acquisition Service$9.5M1.9%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$3.9M0.8%
    2 awards
  5. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$295.8M58%
  2. Research & development$211.8M41%
  3. Equipment maintenance$3.9M0.8%

Where the work was performed

  1. Madison County, AL$416M81%
  2. Okaloosa County, FL$91.6M18%
  3. St. Mary's County, MD$3.9M0.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition15%
    US 39% · $77.3M
  • Sole-source awards1.9%
    US 30% · $9.5M
  • Single-offer competitions13%
    US 8.8% · $67.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Acquisition Service$9.5M
    General Services Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. SINGLE AWARD TO AGAINST GSA OASIS SB R POOL 5B FOR HWIL SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS TO ACQUIRE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE AVIATION AND MISSILE CENTER, S3I DIRECTORATE, HWIL / VIRTUAL SIMULATORS MISSION AREA.$665M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 15, 2021 – Jun 12, 2026· W31P4Q21F0038
  2. SINGLE AWARD TO AGAINST GSA OASIS SB R POOL 5B FOR HWIL MISSILE TO ACQUIRE SOFTWARE/SYSTEMS/SIMULATION ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER RESOURCE ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR THE AVIATION AND MISSILE CENTER, S3I DIRECTORATE, HWIL / VIRTUAL SIMULATORS MISSION AREA.$464M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 1, 2021 – Jun 12, 2026· W31P4Q21F0052
  3. SINGLE AWARD TO AGAINST GSA OASIS SB (POOL 5B) FOR ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPORTING AVIATION AND MISSILE ELEMENT MODELS, SIMULATIONS, AND ANALYSIS FOR THE CCDC AVMC, S3I DIRECTORATE, M&S AREA.$369.3M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 20, 2021 – Mar 25, 2026· W31P4Q21F0054
  4. TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES (TMAS) 2 TENANTS$364.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Professional services· Sep 23, 2022 – Jun 1, 2026· FA248622FA005
  5. TECHNICAL AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT$243.5M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jan 25, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· W31P4Q24FC001
  6. PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING, PROFESSIONAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR GB DIRECTORATE.$213.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Mar 19, 2024 – Jun 4, 2026· FA872124FB001
  7. LIFECYCLE ENGINEERING SUPPORT$179M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Sep 7, 2018 – Jun 5, 2026· W31P4Q18FB002
  8. SPECIALTY ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR SYSTEMS READINESS DIRECTORATE$96.4M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jun 23, 2023 – Jun 10, 2026· W31P4Q23FB004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $192.7K (10 subawards)

10 sub-recipients

  1. ROHDE & SCHWARZ USA, INC.$221.3K100%
    COLUMBIA, MD · 1 subaward
  2. SCIENTIFIC COMPONENTS CORP$99K51%
    BROOKLYN, NY · 1 subaward
  3. FCN, INC.$80.5K42%
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 1 subaward
  4. MONTE SANO RESEARCH CORPORATION$55K29%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  5. ALTAIR ENGINEERING INC.$52.9K27%
    TROY, MI · 1 subaward
  6. TRACE3 GOVERNMENT, LLC$38.2K20%
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward
  7. DELTA RESEARCH INC$81.070.0%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.0% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $934M paid out · $35.5M received
  • FY2022: $431.9M paid out · $14.1M received
  • FY2023: $253.4M paid out · $22.1M received
  • FY2024: $332.5M paid out · $30.4M received
  • FY2025: $250.5M paid out · $29.9M received
  • FY2026: $192.7K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

313 companies · $2.2B reported

  1. MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$246.8M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 227 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC$200M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 205 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. AEROVIRONMENT, INC$156.2M
    SIMI VALLEY, CA · 160 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

26 companies · $281.5M reported

  1. THE BOEING COMPANY$71.6M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 111 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. KBR SERVICES, LLC$32.4M
    HOUSTON, TX · 41 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. LEIDOS, INC.$25M
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GEORGIA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH CORP$1.4B−32% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 4 entities · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION$934.2M−60% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DCS CORPORATION$924.6M−51% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 4 entities · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • TORCH TECHNOLOGIES, INCAI match · 100%
  • Torch Technologies (fka Simvana)AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$288K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.1M
PAC giving · 2026
$104.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$280K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$330K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$288K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$180K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense40 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations20 reports
  3. Education4 reports
  4. Medical and disease research, clinical labs4 reports
  5. Medicare and Medicaid4 reports
  6. Veterans4 reports
  7. Health issues3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES40 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE40 reports
  3. Veterans Affairs - Dept of (VA)4 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Other)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. LINDA MAYNOR, INC.$610K
    14 reports
  2. Adams and Reese, LLP$280K
    14 reports
  3. Cannon|Pearce fka MR. MATT PEARCE$138K
    10 reports
  4. MAYNOR LLC$30K
    1 reports
  5. Strategic Marketing Innovations$20K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$102.5K98%
  2. Democratic$2,0001.9%

PACs sponsored

  • TORCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$213.7K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.