Federal contractor · IRVINE, CA

APTIV SERVICES 3 (US), LLC

No contract obligations recorded for APTIV SERVICES 3 (US), LLC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $12.6M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
KV2MY9E3H1M1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 587.1KFY2017
  2. 5.7MFY2018
  3. 2.8MFY2019
  4. 2.9MFY2020
  5. 530.3KFY2021
  6. 69.9KFY2022
  7. 0FY2024
  8. 0FY2025
  9. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Orange County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 18, 2018 – Nov 20, 2025· SPE4A618C0240

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $95.4K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. CLEARWATER, FL · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $351.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · -$11.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · -$3,193 received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $95.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $5.3M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 18 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 25 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Aptiv Services US, LLCAI match · 99%
  • APTIV, PLCAI match · 95%
Lobbying · 2025
$350K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$835K
$835K in its own reports
PAC giving · 2022
$10.4K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$125K
    11 reports
  3. 2025$350K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$240K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code14 reports
  2. Automotive industry13 reports
  3. Trade (domestic and foreign)10 reports
  4. Economics and economic development4 reports
  5. Defense1 reports
  6. Science and technology1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE23 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES22 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Sidley Austin LLP$435K
    7 reports
  2. ACG Advocacy$160K
    6 reports
  3. Bose Public Affairs Group$30K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2022 cycle

  1. Democratic$5,35052%
  2. Republican$5,00048%

PACs sponsored

  • APTIV, PLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.