Federal contractor · PHILADELPHIA, PA

ARAMARK SERVICES, INC

ARAMARK SERVICES, INC received -$15.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−131% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.3M. Its largest customer was Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$15.3K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
R8HVL2J8L4M6
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC company family: 3 registered entities, $5.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLCPHILADELPHIA, PA · Family page
    $5.8M
  2. $80.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.5MFY2017
  2. 5.6MFY2018
  3. 4.1MFY2019
  4. 3.2MFY2020
  5. -156KFY2021
  6. 25.4KFY2022
  7. 17.8KFY2023
  8. 20.6KFY2024
  9. 48.7KFY2025
  10. -15.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· May 23, 2024 – Jun 8, 2026· 693JK424C500005
  2. Indian Health Service· Pinal County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Nov 30, 2021 – Jun 22, 2026· 75H71222P00009
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· Mendocino County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2020 – Feb 12, 2026· 70Z03121PLBZ00200

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $8.2M (10 subawards)

1 prime

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 10 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $619.1K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $8.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $8.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $21.6M reported

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 13 subawards
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHUGACH SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISE, LLC$118.7M−12% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Facilities support services
  2. CMI MANAGEMENT, LLC$126.1M−6.5% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Facilities support services
  3. VETERANS SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC$280.9K+2,808,732,800% in FY2026
    LAKE WORTH, FL · 1.1% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$450K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.5M
PAC giving · 2024
$13K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$330K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$370K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$450K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$320K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Agriculture14 reports
  2. Banking14 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code14 reports
  4. Civil rights and civil liberties13 reports
  5. Government issues10 reports
  6. Education6 reports
  7. Defense3 reports
  8. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Invariant LLC$1.5M
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2024 cycle

  1. Democratic$10K77%
  2. Republican$3,00023%

PACs sponsored

  • ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. PAC (ARAMARK PAC)$33.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.