Federal contractor · LONDON
ARCADIS CONSULTING (UK) LIMITED
ARCADIS CONSULTING (UK) LIMITED received $450K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+99% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($450K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $450K
- New awards
- 2
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- SNHCDWXXHHT8
- Parent company
- ARCADIS N.V.
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $450K in FY2026 together.
- ARCADIS CONSULTING (UK) LIMITEDLONDON, GBR · Family page$450K
- ESR TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDWARRINGTON, GBR$0
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 684.9KFY2018
- 114.1KFY2019
- 936.7KFY2020
- 577.6KFY2021
- 610.2KFY2022
- 933.2KFY2023
- 476.4KFY2024
- 226KFY2025
- 450KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$450K100%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$450K100%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$450K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $44.9K reported
- FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GSBS, P.C.$1.1M+314% in FY2026SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- HERNANDEZ CALHOUN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL P.A.$1.1M−100% in FY2026PENSACOLA, FL · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING JV$1M−82% in FY2026SAN DIEGO, CA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.