Federal contractor · HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO

ARCADIS U.S., INC.

ARCADIS U.S., INC. received $9.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 47 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $498.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($6.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.5M
New awards
47
Sole-source
4.6%
Single offer
45%
UEI
MNG1DTKJ1LZ3
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $10.3M in FY2026 together.

  1. ARCADIS U.S., INC.HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO · Family page
    $9.5M
  2. ARCADIS U.S., INC.CHATTANOOGA, TN
    $1.1M
  3. ARCADIS CE, INC.WHITE PLAINS, NY
    $0
  4. $0
  5. ARCADIS GERMANY GMBHDARMSTADT, DEU
    $0
  6. ARCADIS INC.WASHINGTON
    $0
  7. ARCADIS U.S., INC.BATON ROUGE, LA
    $0
  8. ARCADIS INC.HANOVER, MD
    -$240.5K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 69.4MFY2017
  2. 63MFY2018
  3. 50.6MFY2019
  4. 56.8MFY2020
  5. 42.3MFY2021
  6. 58.5MFY2022
  7. 42.9MFY2023
  8. 82MFY2024
  9. 23.5MFY2025
  10. 9.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 28 awards
  2. 15 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$7.8M82%
  2. Research & development$1.2M13%
  3. Professional services$257.2K2.7%
  4. Facilities & utilities$175.5K1.9%

Where the work was performed

  1. York County, VA$471.3K5.0%
  2. Wake County, NC$390.3K4.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition50%
    US 39% · $4.7M
  • Sole-source awards4.6%
    US 30% · $431.4K
  • Single-offer competitions45%
    US 8.8% · $4.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Bergen County, NJ· Construction & real property· Sep 2, 2021 – Aug 19, 2026· W912DQ21F3052
  2. Department of the Army· Bergen County, NJ· Construction & real property· Nov 7, 2016 – Oct 8, 2025· 0002
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· Pasquotank County, NC· Construction & real property· Oct 9, 2025 – Oct 9, 2025· HSCCG8307J3CL158
  4. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Mar 28, 2019 – Jun 5, 2026· W912EP19F0095
  5. Department of the Army· Douglas County, CO· Construction & real property· Apr 1, 2021 – Jan 26, 2026· W912P821F0090
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Sonoma County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 4, 2023 – Jun 25, 2026· 70Z08823FESDV0027
  7. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NJ· Construction & real property· Jul 13, 2020 – Oct 30, 2025· W912DQ20F3030
  8. U.S. Coast Guard· Kodiak Island Borough, AK· Construction & real property· Mar 29, 2021 – Jan 7, 2026· 70Z08721FPXA10100

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $961.9K (9 subawards)

8 sub-recipients

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  2. SAINT PAUL, MN · 2 subawards
  3. PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC$138.2K14%
    GREEN BAY, WI · 1 subaward
  4. METAIRIE, LA · 1 subaward
  5. ADVANCED DRILLING, INC.$94.4K9.8%
    HAMPTON, NJ · 1 subaward
  6. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$77K8.0%
    DES MOINES, IA · 1 subaward
  7. RENO, NV · 1 subaward
  8. PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.$33.3K3.5%
    BURLINGTON, NC · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5.1M (9 subawards)

5 primes

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 4 subawards
  2. LYNCHBURG, VA · 1 subaward
  3. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward
  4. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards
  5. GOLDEN, CO · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 10% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2M paid out · $4.9M received
  • FY2022: $7M paid out · $814.5K received
  • FY2023: $20.3M paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2024: $5.9M paid out · $17.7M received
  • FY2025: $2.7M paid out · $5.3M received
  • FY2026: $961.9K paid out · $5.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

82 companies · $39.4M reported

  1. REDOX TECH LLC$8.6M
    CARY, NC · 3 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. WINSTON, GA · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. METAIRIE, LA · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

23 companies · $83.6M reported

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  2. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. GROTON, CT · 7 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RIYADH, SAU · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MPR ASSOCIATES, INC.$43.6M−4.9% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BOSTON, MA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ARCADIS U.S., INC. (8 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ARCADIS U.S. INC.AI match · 100%
PAC giving · 2022
$1,000
1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2022 cycle

  1. Republican$1,000100%

PACs sponsored

  • ARCADIS U.S. INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARCADIS PAC)$78.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.