Federal contractor · SAINT PAUL, MN

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC received $751.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 27 awards. Since FY2017: $11.9M. Its largest customer was Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation ($324.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$751.6K
New awards
27
Sole-source
60%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Q22QFB1HNMD3
Parent company
ALPHA ANALYTICAL, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

6 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLCSAINT PAUL, MN · Family page
    $751.6K
  2. VERITEXT LLCLIVINGSTON, NJ
    $354.6K
  3. AERSALE, INC.ROSWELL, NM
    $0
  4. ALPHA ANALYTICAL, INC.WESTBOROUGH, MA
    $0
  5. $0
  6. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.9MFY2017
  2. 1.6MFY2018
  3. 1.6MFY2019
  4. 2.4MFY2020
  5. 1.4MFY2021
  6. 2.8MFY2022
  7. -140.8KFY2023
  8. 394.5KFY2024
  9. -648.5KFY2025
  10. 751.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. Forest Service$28.4K3.8%
    3 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$405.9K54%
  2. Professional services$341.4K45%
  3. Construction & real property$4,2380.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition60%
    US 39% · $447.5K
  • Sole-source awards60%
    US 30% · $450.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$2,800
  • Urgency justifications5.2%
    US 5.1% · $39K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Transportation · 4 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards
  3. Department of Agriculture · 1 awards
  4. Department of Justice · 1 awards
  5. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Cabell County, WV· Professional services· Feb 23, 2026 – Feb 23, 2026· W9123726FA075
  2. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT· Facilities & utilities· Oct 17, 2025 – Oct 17, 2025· 6913G626P800002
  3. Department of the Army· Mason County, WV· Professional services· Dec 20, 2024 – Mar 2, 2026· W9123725P0005
  4. National Park Service· Shasta County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 29, 2024 – Apr 15, 2026· 140P8424P0023
  5. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· Ramsey County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Nov 13, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· 6913G626P800004
  6. U.S. Geological Survey· Ramsey County, MN· Professional services· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· 140G0226F0123
  7. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· Ramsey County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Sep 21, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 6913G626P800052
  8. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· Ramsey County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Aug 26, 2026 – Aug 26, 2026· 6913G626P800048

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.8M (14 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $52K (1 subaward)

11 primes

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  2. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 2 subawards
  3. TULLAHOMA, TN · 2 subawards
  4. LOS ANGELES, CA · 2 subawards
  5. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward
  6. LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward
  7. HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO · 2 subawards
  8. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward
  9. INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 1 subaward
  10. WEST CHESTER, PA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $4.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

32 companies · $30.2M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 31 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. GROTON, CT · 5 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 23 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 30 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALASKA TESTLAB, LLC$824.4K−100% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesU.S. Geological Survey · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PORTSMOUTH, VA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. COTTER-MOCA JOINT VENTURE$831.3K−41% in FY2026
    BURR RIDGE, IL · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.