Federal contractor · OVERLAND PARK, KS
ARGUS CONSULTING, INC.
ARGUS CONSULTING, INC. received $2.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−35% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.3M
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JTY6FPZ9GZV6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.1MFY2017
- 2.7MFY2018
- 2.3MFY2019
- 379KFY2020
- 298KFY2021
- 1.8MFY2022
- 1.5MFY2023
- 1.6MFY2024
- 3.5MFY2025
- 2.3MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$2.3M100%5 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$2.3M100%
Where the work was performed
- Berkeley County, SC$950.2K42%
- Charleston County, SC$446.9K20%
- El Paso County, TX$383.3K17%
- Johnson County, MO$358.6K16%
- Monroe County, PA$147.6K6.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Clark County, NV· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2024 – May 27, 2026· FA890324F0003
- Department of the Army· Berkeley County, SC· Construction & real property· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· W9128F26FA042
- Department of the Army· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Nov 28, 2025 – Nov 28, 2025· W9128F26FA020
- Department of the Army· El Paso County, TX· Construction & real property· May 7, 2026 – May 7, 2026· W9128F26FA078
- Department of the Army· Johnson County, MO· Construction & real property· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W9128F26FA073
- Department of the Army· Monroe County, PA· Construction & real property· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W9128F26FA081
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $131.4K (1 subaward)
1 prime
- DAWSON ENTERPRISES, LLC$131.4K100%HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $172.8K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $291.2K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $356.8K received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $131.4K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $952.1K reported
- DAWSON ENTERPRISES, INC.$848.1KHONOLULU, HI · 6 subawards · Utility system construction
- CH2M HILL, INC$67.8KENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$36.3KDAYTON, OH · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- EIJV LLP$7.3M−42% in FY2026CHICAGO, IL · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- GROUP 70 GUSHIKEN A-E, LLP$6.6M+132% in FY2026HONOLULU, HI · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- GURRI MATUTE CROMWELL JV LLC$5M−98% in FY2026MIAMI, FL · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.