Federal contractor · CHICAGO, IL

EIJV LLP

EIJV LLP received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−42% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $23.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
NV2WKB527HL6
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 175.4KFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 907.3KFY2020
  5. 4MFY2021
  6. 4.7MFY2022
  7. 2.9MFY2023
  8. 3.3MFY2024
  9. 2.6MFY2025
  10. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.5M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.5M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $1.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Jul 14, 2022 – Feb 19, 2026· W912HV22F0038
  2. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· May 14, 2025 – Mar 23, 2026· W912HV25F0033
  3. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· W912HV26FA008
  4. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Jul 31, 2025 – Feb 13, 2026· FA520925F0244
  5. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· May 13, 2025 – Mar 31, 2026· W912HV25F0035

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARGUS CONSULTING, INC.$7.4M−35% in FY2026
    OVERLAND PARK, KS · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GROUP 70 GUSHIKEN A-E, LLP$6.6M+132% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GURRI MATUTE CROMWELL JV LLC$5M−98% in FY2026
    MIAMI, FL · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.