Federal contractor · OSSINING, NY

AROBOTICSCOMPANY, INC

AROBOTICSCOMPANY, INC received $2.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+15% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $13.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.5M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DWSPAZY1RGJ1
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9MFY2023
  2. 149.7KFY2024
  3. 2.2MFY2025
  4. 2.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$2.5M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Westchester County, NY· Research & development· Mar 19, 2026 – May 12, 2026· W5170126CA002
  2. Department of the Army· Westchester County, NY· Research & development· Mar 20, 2026 – Mar 20, 2026· W5170126CA175
  3. Department of the Air Force· Westchester County, NY· Research & development· Aug 8, 2025 – Feb 13, 2026· FA239425PB006
  4. Department of the Navy· Westchester County, NY· Research & development· Mar 20, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· N0002425CS079
  5. Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· Research & development· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· FA822226PB005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INTELLIEPI IR, INC$5.6M−91% in FY2026
    RICHARDSON, TX · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. DORNERWORKS, LLC$5.6M−100% in FY2026
    GRAND RAPIDS, MI · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. STRATIN LLC$6.2M−79% in FY2026
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.