Federal contractor · MOORESVILLE, NC
ATEA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
ATEA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $7.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+37% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $16.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($4.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $7.8M
- New awards
- 8
- Sole-source
- 71%
- Single offer
- 26%
- UEI
- EE78Z6H4A3G6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 267KFY2023
- 2.9MFY2024
- 5.7MFY2025
- 7.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$4.5M58%5 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$2M26%2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$1.2M16%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Research & development$7.8M100%
Where the work was performed
- Ventura County, CA$4.3M55%
- Iredell County, NC$2.3M29%
- Houston County, GA$1.2M16%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition96%US 39% · $7.5M
- Sole-source awards71%US 30% · $5.5M
- Single-offer competitions26%US 8.8% · $2M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Research & development· Mar 7, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· N6893625F0254
- Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Research & development· Mar 9, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· N6893626F5116
- Missile Defense Agency· Iredell County, NC· Research & development· May 6, 2026 – May 6, 2026· HQ086026CE056
- Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Research & development· Jul 31, 2025 – Jun 2, 2026· N6893625F0504
- Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Research & development· Oct 23, 2025 – Oct 23, 2025· FA857126C0002
- Department of the Navy· Iredell County, NC· Research & development· Oct 14, 2025 – Mar 5, 2026· N6833526C0061
- Department of the Navy· Iredell County, NC· Research & development· Oct 16, 2025 – Oct 16, 2025· N6833526C0109
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 16, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FG151
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $275.1K reported
- NORMAN, OK · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- JACOBS/HDR, A JOINT VENTURE (NAVFAC ATLANTIC SRM)$10.6M−57% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH & ASSOCIATES LLC$12.9M−87% in FY2026RICHMOND, VA · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- NESER, ROOMSBURG & WORKMAN, P.C.$10.5M−37% in FY2026VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.