Federal contractor · CHICAGO, IL

BAILEY EDWARD DESIGN, INC

BAILEY EDWARD DESIGN, INC received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 35 awards (+44% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $29.5M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
35
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
14%
UEI
HGCMR6UZQ4W9
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2MFY2017
  2. 2.8MFY2018
  3. 1.8MFY2019
  4. 2.9MFY2020
  5. 2.6MFY2021
  6. 3.1MFY2022
  7. 4.6MFY2023
  8. 3.8MFY2024
  9. 2.3MFY2025
  10. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 18 awards
  3. Forest Service$277.5K8.2%
    1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$3.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cook County, IL$956.2K28%
  2. Cole County, MO$156.9K4.6%
  3. Dane County, WI$42.2K1.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $481.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.8% · $481.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Research Service· Story County, IA· Construction & real property· May 17, 2024 – Aug 4, 2026· 12505B24F0055
  2. Agricultural Research Service· Cook County, IL· Construction & real property· Mar 7, 2025 – May 19, 2026· 12505B25F0029
  3. Public Buildings Service· Cook County, IL· Construction & real property· Nov 1, 2017 – Feb 9, 2026· 47PF0018F0037
  4. Agricultural Research Service· Story County, IA· Construction & real property· Jul 14, 2026 – Jul 14, 2026· 1232SA26F0371
  5. Agricultural Research Service· Marathon County, WI· Construction & real property· Aug 15, 2024 – Dec 10, 2025· 12505B24F0157
  6. U.S. Geological Survey· Cook County, IL· Construction & real property· Mar 10, 2022 – Aug 11, 2026· 140G0122F0111
  7. Agricultural Research Service· Dane County, WI· Construction & real property· May 12, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 12805B25F0046
  8. Agricultural Research Service· Peoria County, IL· Construction & real property· Sep 13, 2024 – Sep 8, 2026· 12505B24F0195

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $110.1K reported

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAgricultural Research Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. YARDLEY, PA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. THE SCHEMMER ASSOCIATES INC.$7.3M−64% in FY2026
    OMAHA, NE · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.