Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ

BEACON GROUP, INC.

BEACON GROUP, INC. received $3.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−48% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $53.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($2.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.8M
New awards
14
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Z7FVTAZGKX52
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.9MFY2017
  2. 3.6MFY2018
  3. 4.2MFY2019
  4. 7.2MFY2020
  5. 3MFY2021
  6. 6.1MFY2022
  7. 5.6MFY2023
  8. 7.8MFY2024
  9. 7.3MFY2025
  10. 3.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$3.6M96%
  2. Construction & real property$156.3K4.1%
  3. Professional services$11.6K0.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Davis County, UT$156.3K4.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $3.8M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $3.8M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 3 awards
  2. General Services Administration · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Jun 25, 2022 – May 15, 2026· FA822422C0006
  2. Defense Information Systems Agency· Cochise County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· May 25, 2023 – May 14, 2026· HC102823C0004
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Nov 14, 2024 – May 5, 2026· 36C77025C0001
  4. Bureau of Reclamation· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 13, 2022 – Jul 28, 2026· 140R3022P0020
  5. Agricultural Research Service· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Dec 27, 2023 – May 29, 2026· 12905B24C0002
  6. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Pinal County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Dec 30, 2024 – Jul 22, 2026· 140A1125P0001
  7. Public Buildings Service· El Paso County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jul 6, 2026 – Jul 6, 2026· 47PD5226F0345
  8. Public Buildings Service· El Paso County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· 47PD5226F0132

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $86.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $175.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $226.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $81.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $569K reported

  1. PHOENIX, AZ · 14 subawards
  2. PIMA COUNTY$75.3K
    TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NOC TECHNOLOGIES INC$7.3M−11% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
  2. MASKIL CONSULTANTS LLC$8.5M+186% in FY2026
    DAYTON, OH · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
  3. SANEI THANKS, K.K.$10.2M−15% in FY2026
    KOZA-GUN, JPN · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.