Federal contractor · OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

BENHAM - MEAD & HUNT

BENHAM - MEAD & HUNT received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−59% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $48.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
15
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
ZYQLWU9975J5
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.3MFY2018
  2. 5MFY2019
  3. 2.7MFY2020
  4. 2.3MFY2021
  5. 3.6MFY2022
  6. 14.7MFY2023
  7. 7.7MFY2024
  8. 8.3MFY2025
  9. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$3.2M94%
    13 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$205.4K6.1%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$3.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Juneau County, WI$1.2M37%
  2. Alpena County, MI$1.2M36%
  3. Macomb County, MI$466.7K14%
  4. Abroad$205.4K6.1%
  5. Muskingum County, OH$84.3K2.5%
  6. Vigo County, IN$72.8K2.2%
  7. Miami-Dade County, FL$39.8K1.2%
  8. Greene County, OH$29.1K0.9%
  9. Bernalillo County, NM$21.2K0.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $3.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $3.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. AE DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE MANNED/UNMANNED TACTICAL VEHICLE LAB AT DETROIT ARSENAL, MI.$3.2M
    Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· Construction & real property· Oct 6, 2022 – Dec 11, 2025· W912QR23F0001
  2. INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR TRADITIONAL TITLE I, TITLE II, AND OTHER ARCHITECT ENGINEER SERVICES, AE NEXT 2021; POOL 4, FACILITIES AND GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE.$3.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 10, 2024 – Feb 26, 2026· FA520524F0120
  3. AE SERVICES FOR PROJECT AXQD232620, DESIGN RENOVATION OF BUILDING 25 AT THE 104TH FW, BARNES ANGB, WESTFIELD, MA.$1.8M
    Department of the Army· Hampden County, MA· Construction & real property· Aug 15, 2024 – Dec 22, 2025· W50S8124FA015
  4. INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR TRADITIONAL TITLE I, TITLE II, AND OTHER ARCHITECT ENGINEER SERVICES, AE NEXT 2021 POOL 4, FACILITIES AND GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE.$1.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – Feb 3, 2026· FA468625FA009
  5. AE DESIGN FOR HISTORIC RENOVATION BUILDING 44, FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS$1.5M
    Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2023 – May 5, 2026· W912DQ23F4064
  6. AE SERVICES FOR HOMESTEAD ARB$1.3M
    Department of the Army· Miami-Dade County, FL· Construction & real property· Jun 14, 2019 – Feb 2, 2026· W912QR19F0260
  7. REPLACE/ CONSOLIDATE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Juneau County, WI· Construction & real property· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· W50S9H26FA011
  8. AE SERVICES TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) PACKAGE FOR A NEW TROOP QUARTERS FACILITY IN SUPPORT OF THE COMBAT READINESS TRAINING CENTER (CRTC) AT ALPENA ANG, LOCATED IN MICHIGAN.$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Alpena County, MI· Construction & real property· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W912QR26FA098

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYMOND POND ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS JV LLC$16.9M+141% in FY2026
    CONYERS, GA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SAIN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.$16.8M−33% in FY2026
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RDR, INC.$13.2M+744% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.