Federal contractor · CONYERS, GA

RAYMOND POND ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS JV LLC

RAYMOND POND ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS JV LLC received $5.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (+141% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $24.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.7M
New awards
14
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
6.2%
UEI
QTJUNB3496C4
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 173.4KFY2021
  2. 1.7MFY2022
  3. 6.1MFY2023
  4. 8.8MFY2024
  5. 2.4MFY2025
  6. 5.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards
  2. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$5.7M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bay County, FL$200.5K3.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition6.2%
    US 39% · $352.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions6.2%
    US 8.7% · $352.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· Construction & real property· Jun 21, 2024 – Apr 13, 2026· W9127824F0123
  2. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Construction & real property· Aug 19, 2024 – Mar 2, 2026· FA850124F0113
  3. Department of the Army· Rockdale County, GA· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· W50S7W25FA007
  4. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Construction & real property· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· FA850126F0095
  5. Department of the Army· Lowndes County, MS· Construction & real property· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· W9127826FA099
  6. Department of the Army· Hillsborough County, FL· Construction & real property· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· W9127826FA097
  7. Department of the Army· Escambia County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 11, 2023 – Mar 6, 2026· W9127823F0341
  8. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Construction & real property· May 30, 2024 – Feb 11, 2026· FA850124F0040

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $214.2K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  2. OLATHE, KS · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.8% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $214.2K reported

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. OLATHE, KS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BENHAM - MEAD & HUNT$19.3M−59% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SAIN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.$16.8M−33% in FY2026
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RDR, INC.$13.2M+744% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.