Federal contractor · OVERLAND PARK, KS

BLACK & VEATCH - GEI JV

BLACK & VEATCH - GEI JV received $14.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+167% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $24.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($14.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.7M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
H7M4KKLDTRD5
Parent company
BLACK & VEATCH HOLDING CO
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP. company family: 2 registered entities, $24.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.OVERLAND PARK, KS · Family page
    $10M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 15KFY2022
  2. 202.7KFY2023
  3. 4.5MFY2024
  4. 5.5MFY2025
  5. 14.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$14.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Tarrant County, TX· Construction & real property· Feb 6, 2026 – May 19, 2026· W9126G26FA030
  2. Department of the Army· Cabell County, WV· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2025 – Apr 23, 2026· W9123725FA094
  3. Department of the Army· Sacramento County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 21, 2023 – Feb 27, 2026· W9123723F0186

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

141 companies · $140.7M reported

  1. PARANAQUE, PHL · 20 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. MODERN HUR ROAD CO. FOR PROJECTS MANAGEMENT & GENERAL TRADING LTD$11.9M
    BAGHDAD, IQ · 2 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. ESCHBORN, DEU · 16 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $26.3M reported

  1. DURHAM, NC · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 16 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SOUTHWEST RANGE SERVICES LLC$175.7M−40% in FY2026
    LAS CRUCES, NM · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DIGIFLIGHT INCORPORATED$183.5M−23% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. AVION SOLUTIONS, INC.$149.5M−30% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP. (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$350K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.2M
$1.2M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$126K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$339K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$360K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$350K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$170K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code24 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear23 reports
  3. Environment and Superfund12 reports
  4. Utilities12 reports
  5. Miscellaneous tariff bills6 reports
  6. Homeland security2 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)2 reports
  8. Clean air and water1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES25 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE24 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cardinal Point Partners$410K
    13 reports
  2. OGR$170K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$81.5K65%
  2. Democratic$44.5K35%

PACs sponsored

  • BLACK & VEATCH POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (BLACK & VEATCH PAC)$278.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.