Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ

BLUE YONDER, INC.

BLUE YONDER, INC. received $6.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−0.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $53.7M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($6.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.3M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
GFFEGV4LU163
Parent company
CUBIX CORPORATION
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BLUE YONDER DEFENSE SOLUTIONS, LLC company family: 3 registered entities, $32.7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BLUE YONDER DEFENSE SOLUTIONS, LLCDALLAS, TX · Family page
    $22.5M
  2. ILC DOVER LPFREDERICA, DE
    $3.9M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7MFY2017
  2. 7.5MFY2018
  3. 452.4KFY2019
  4. 7.5MFY2020
  5. 6.9MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 1.3MFY2023
  8. 9.3MFY2024
  9. 6.3MFY2025
  10. 6.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$6.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $6.3M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $6.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Nov 30, 2023 – Nov 4, 2025· SP470124C0014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $232.3K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $34.8K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $580K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $464.4K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $597.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $624.8K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $232.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $6M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. FERNANDINA BEACH, FL · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $70.2M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 10 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HPI SOLUTIONS LLC$36.6M−1.4% in FY2026
    OMAHA, NE · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. NETRIST SOLUTIONS, LLC$37.4M+378% in FY2026
    CHARLESTON, SC · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ZIGABYTE CORPORATION$38.6M+5.3% in FY2026
    LUGOFF, SC · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.