Federal contractor · SAINT LOUIS, MO

THE BOEING COMPANY

THE BOEING COMPANY received $6.1B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 437 awards (−2.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $68.5B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($4.9B).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.1B
New awards
437
Sole-source
94%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JJM4FRDZJDX1
Parent company
THE BOEING COMPANY
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

99 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $27.2B in FY2026 together.

  1. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO · Family page
    $6.1B
  2. $9B
  3. $2.5B
  4. THE BOEING COMPANYRIDLEY PARK, PA
    $2.3B
  5. THE BOEING COMPANYLONG BEACH, CA
    $1.8B
  6. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $1.3B
  7. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $1.2B
  8. THE BOEING COMPANYOKLAHOMA CITY, OK
    $856.7M
  9. THE BOEING COMPANYEL SEGUNDO, CA
    $528.7M
  10. $368.2M
  11. $271.3M
  12. THE BOEING COMPANYOKLAHOMA CITY, OK
    $177.6M
  13. $128.6M
  14. $118.9M
  15. $94M
  16. $81.5M
  17. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
    $76.6M
  18. $41.4M
  19. THE BOEING COMPANYJACKSONVILLE, FL
    $38.9M
  20. THE BOEING COMPANYCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $34.7M
Show all 99 members
  1. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $32.1M
  2. $26M
  3. $25M
  4. THE BOEING COMPANYALBUQUERQUE, NM
    $22.1M
  5. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $19.8M
  6. ARGON ST, INC.FAIRFAX, VA
    $16.2M
  7. $15.4M
  8. $15.3M
  9. $12.9M
  10. $7.5M
  11. $7.3M
  12. $4.3M
  13. $4.1M
  14. VEROCEL, INCWESTFORD, MA
    $3.3M
  15. INSITU, INC.BINGEN, WA
    $3M
  16. $1.9M
  17. $1.6M
  18. $895.8K
  19. $600.1K
  20. $400K
  21. $277.7K
  22. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $260K
  23. THE BOEING COMPANYCANOGA PARK, CA
    $160.6K
  24. FOREFLIGHT LLCHOUSTON, TX
    $123.5K
  25. $15.8K
  26. BOEING COMPANY, THEARLINGTON, VA
    $7,539
  27. 2D3, INC.IRVINE, CA
    $0
  28. ARGON ST, INC.FAIRFAX, VA
    $0
  29. ARGON ST, INC.VENTURA, CA
    $0
  30. ARGON ST, INC.SAN DIEGO, CA
    $0
  31. ARGON ST, INC.MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
    $0
  32. $0
  33. $0
  34. AUTOMETRIC INC.SPRINGFIELD, VA
    $0
  35. $0
  36. AVIALL SERVICES, INC.PARSIPPANY, NJ
    $0
  37. $0
  38. $0
  39. $0
  40. BOEING COMPANYSEAL BEACH, CA
    $0
  41. BOEING COMPANY, THEWEST HILLS, CA
    $0
  42. $0
  43. $0
  44. BOEING COMPANY, THETITUSVILLE, FL
    $0
  45. $0
  46. BOEING COMPANY, THELONG BEACH, CA
    $0
  47. $0
  48. $0
  49. $0
  50. $0
  51. BOEING LAUNCH SERVICES, INC.HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
    $0
  52. $0
  53. BOEING-SVS, INCALBUQUERQUE, NM
    $0
  54. $0
  55. $0
  56. SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS INCFARMERS BRANCH, TX
    $0
  57. $0
  58. THE BOEING COMPANYFORT WALTON BEACH, FL
    $0
  59. THE BOEING COMPANYLONG BEACH, CA
    $0
  60. THE BOEING COMPANYANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
    $0
  61. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
    $0
  62. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $0
  63. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $0
  64. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
    $0
  65. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
    $0
  66. THE BOEING COMPANYSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $0
  67. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
    $0
  68. THE BOEING COMPANYRIDLEY PARK, PA
    $0
  69. THE BOEING COMPANYRICHARDSON, TX
    $0
  70. $0
  71. $0
  72. THE BOEING COMPANYHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $0
  73. $0
  74. $0
  75. -$2,953
  76. -$133.1K
  77. -$164.8K
  78. THE BOEING COMPANYALBUQUERQUE, NM
    -$375.9K
  79. ARGON ST, INC.SMITHFIELD, PA
    -$615.2K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.1BFY2017
  2. 9.8BFY2018
  3. 7.8BFY2019
  4. 8.8BFY2020
  5. 6BFY2021
  6. 3.4BFY2022
  7. 7.8BFY2023
  8. 8.6BFY2024
  9. 6.3BFY2025
  10. 6.1BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 157 awards
  2. 198 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 78 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$5.5B89%
  2. Equipment maintenance$348.6M5.7%
  3. Research & development$138.9M2.3%
  4. Professional services$131M2.1%
  5. Other equipment & supplies$36.8M0.6%
  6. IT & telecom$2M0.0%
  7. Transportation & logistics$111.2K0.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$612.1M10%
  2. King County, WA$121.5M2.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition94%
    US 39% · $5.7B
  • Sole-source awards94%
    US 30% · $5.7B
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $864.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 28 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 36 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 12 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 2, 2016 – Apr 13, 2026· FA863412C2651
  2. Department of the Air Force· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 22, 2017 – Jun 10, 2026· FA863418C2701
  3. Department of the Navy· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 8, 2018 – Mar 19, 2026· N0001918C1046
  4. Department of the Air Force· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 28, 2023 – May 15, 2026· FA863423F0048
  5. Defense Contract Management Agency· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Feb 27, 2017 – Mar 5, 2026· N0001917C0003
  6. Department of the Navy· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 13, 2020 – Jan 12, 2026· N0001920C0003
  7. Department of the Air Force· St. Louis County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 29, 2022 – May 15, 2026· FA863422F0035
  8. Department of the Navy· St. Louis County, MO· Research & development· Aug 30, 2018 – Jun 18, 2026· N0001918C1012

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE BOEING COMPANY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$400K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 400KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2023.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2B (966 subawards)

331 sub-recipients

  1. PONTIAC, MI · 15 subawards
  2. NASHUA, NH · 17 subawards
  3. CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 5 subawards
  4. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 9 subawards
  5. MCKINNEY, TX · 5 subawards
  6. WOODWARD CONTROLS, INC.$76.8M3.8%
    NILES, IL · 7 subawards
  7. CAMDEN, AR · 2 subawards
  8. SIMPSONVILLE, SC · 41 subawards
  9. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 6 subawards
  10. FORT WORTH, TX · 16 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $86.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 33% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2.6B paid out · $108.4M received
  • FY2022: $2.6B paid out · $17M received
  • FY2023: $1.6B paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2024: $2.9B paid out · $12.2M received
  • FY2025: $4B paid out · $8.5M received
  • FY2026: $2B paid out · $86.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,364 companies · $39.4B reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 2,203 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. YORK, PA · 796 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 697 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

94 companies · $8.9B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 809 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 205 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 47 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 167 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$84.4B−24% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 227 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+10 more
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$171.9B−38% in FY2026
    FORT WORTH, TX · 128 entities · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Contract Management Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+7 more
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+12 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE BOEING COMPANY (99 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Jeppesen ForeFlightAI match · 100%
  • SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC.AI match · 100%
  • THE BOEING COMPANYAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$11.3M
52 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$42.9M
$42.9M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.4M
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$14.4M
    71 reports
  2. 2024$11.9M
    65 reports
  3. 2025$11.3M
    52 reports
  4. 2026$5.2M
    29 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense110 reports
  2. Aviation, aircraft and airlines104 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations60 reports
  4. Aerospace53 reports
  5. Health issues39 reports
  6. Trade (domestic and foreign)39 reports
  7. Environment and Superfund28 reports
  8. Foreign relations21 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES201 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE198 reports
  3. Navy - Dept of21 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Crossroads Strategies, LLC$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. S-3 Group$960K
    14 reports
  3. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$880K
    15 reports
  4. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$770K
    10 reports
  5. The Lugar Group (FKA Lugar Hellmann Group)$650K
    13 reports
  6. Empire Consulting Group$630K
    14 reports
  7. Avoq, LLC$560K
    7 reports
  8. Squire Patton Boggs$490K
    11 reports

22 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$844.5K62%
  2. Democratic$512.5K37%
  3. Other or none$11.5K0.8%

PACs sponsored

  • THE BOEING COMPANY PAC$3.9M raised this cycle
  • SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC. PAC$44.6K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.