Federal contractor · LINCOLN, NE

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA received $188.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($143.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$188.7K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
M1T9PNB1LMB8
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA company family: 3 registered entities, $2.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $1.5M
  2. $1.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 529.3KFY2017
  2. 365.3KFY2018
  3. 578.6KFY2019
  4. 397.9KFY2020
  5. 644.8KFY2021
  6. 560.7KFY2022
  7. 556.5KFY2023
  8. 277.5KFY2024
  9. 1.3MFY2025
  10. 188.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$143.7K76%
  2. Construction & real property$45K24%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $188.7K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $188.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Lancaster County, NE· Education & social services· Feb 25, 2026 – Feb 25, 2026· N3560A26FB133
  2. Department of the Army· Lancaster County, NE· Construction & real property· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W9124326PA005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

457 companies · $233.7M reported

  1. OMAHA, NE · 18 subawards
  2. LA JOLLA, CA · 1 subaward
  3. COLUMBIA, MO · 15 subawards

Primes that pay it

201 companies · $364.8M reported

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 196 subawards
  2. LINCOLN, NE · 83 subawards
  3. PRINCETON, NJ · 9 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Business, professional, labor, political, and similar organizationsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$5.6M−60% in FY2026
    FARGO, ND · 2 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Administration of environmental quality programsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesAir Force · Educational support services+1 more
  3. UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$4.1M+20% in FY2026
    LARAMIE, WY · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Administration of environmental quality programsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.