Federal contractor · PRINCETON, NJ

THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY

THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY received $230M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+0.8% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6B. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($196.2M). It also received $147.8M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$230M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
99.9%
UEI
NJ1YPQXQG7U5
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 102.1MFY2017
  2. 125.1MFY2018
  3. 142.2MFY2019
  4. 145.1MFY2020
  5. 150.8MFY2021
  6. 170.2MFY2022
  7. 170MFY2023
  8. 149.1MFY2024
  9. 228.2MFY2025
  10. 230MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$196.2M85%
  2. Research & development$33.8M15%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99.9%
    US 39% · $229.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions99.9%
    US 8.7% · $229.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Middlesex County, NJ· Facilities & utilities· Oct 11, 2016 – Sep 29, 2026· DEAC0209CH11466
  2. INTERSTELLAR MAPPING AND ACCELERATION PROBE (IMAP) IS A WATERSHED MISSION THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY INVESTIGATES THE ACCELERATION OF ENERGETIC PARTICLES AND INTERACTION OF THE SOLAR WIND WITH THE LOCAL INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM. IMAP WILL 1) ADVANCE THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL EVOLUTION OF THE BOUNDARY REGION IN WHICH THE SOLAR WIND AND INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM INTERACT, 2) IDENTIFY AND ADVANCE THE UNDERSTANDING OF PROCESSES RELATED TO THE INTERACTIONS OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD OF THE SUN AND THE LOCAL INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM, 3) IMPROVE THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMPOSITION AND PROPERTIES OF THE LOCAL INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM, AND 4) IDENTIFY AND ADVANCE THE UNDERSTANDING OF PARTICLE INJECTION AND ACCELERATION PROCESSES NEAR THE SUN, IN THE HELIOSPHERE AND HELIOSHEATH. IMAP IS BASED ON A COMPLETE AND SYNERGISTIC SET OF OBSERVATIONS. IN SITU AT 1AU, THIS REQUIRES DETAILED OBSERVATIONS OF THE SOLAR WIND ELECTRONS AND IONS SUPRATHERMAL, PICKUP, AND ENERGETIC ION POPULATIONS AND MAGNETIC FIELD. FOR THE OUTER HELIOSPHERE INTERACTION, IT REQUIRES ADVANCED GLOBAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE REMOTE PLASMA AND ENERGETIC IONS OVER A BROAD ENERGY RANGE VIA ENERGETIC NEUTRAL ATOM (ENA) IMAGING, AS WELL AS PRECISE OBSERVATION OF THE NEUTRAL INTERSTELLAR ATOMS PENETRATING THE HELIOSPHERE. COMPLEMENTARY OBSERVATIONS OF INTERSTELLAR DUST AND THE UV GLOW OF INTERSTELLAR NEUTRALS, WHILE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE THRESHOLD MISSION, ADD IMPORTANT CONTEXT AND INSIGHTS TO DEEPEN PHYSICAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE BASELINE MISSION. THESE OBSERVATIONAL NEEDS WILL REQUIRE AN INTEGRATED AND COORDINATED SUITE OF 10 INSTRUMENTS THAT SPAN BOTH THE IN SITU AND REMOTE IMAGING ASPECTS OF THE INVESTIGATION. AS THE PI INSTITUTION PRINCETON UNIVERSITY OVERSEES THE DEVELOPMENT OF IMAP TO ENSURE COST, RISK, AND SCIENCE OBJECTIVES ARE MET IN THE CONTEXT OF AN OVERALL PLAN TO DEVELOP, INTEGRATE, TEST, LAUNCH, COMMISSION, AND OPERATE THE IMAP MISSION. PRINCETON WILL DEVELOP THE SOLAR WIND AND PICKUP ION (SWAPI) INSTRUMENT, MANAGE THE MISSION SCIENCE TEAM, DEVELOP THE INTERSTELLAR DUST EXPERIMENT (IDEX) INSTRUMENT DATA PIPELINE, INITIATE THE FUTURE LEADERS PROGRAM, AND OVERSEE THE MISSION STUDENT COLLABORATION.$76.6M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Mercer County, NJ· Research & development· Dec 18, 2018 – Jul 7, 2026· 80GSFC19C0027
  3. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR IBEX INTERSTELLAR BOUNDARY EXPLORER (IBEX) SUPPORT. THIS CONTRACT IS A RESULT OF A PI TRANSFER FROM NNG05EC85C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE IBEX MISSION INCLUDING: 1) LIFE-CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2) DESIGN, TEST, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONS (PAYLOAD, SPACECRAFT, LAUNCH VEHICLE, SPACECRAFT TO LAUNCH-VEHICLE INTERFACES, LAUNCH AND FLIGHT OPERATIONS) AND 3) POST-OPERATIONS DATA ANALYSIS AND ARCHIVING. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS EFFORT, THE IBEX TEAM SHALL: A. MANAGE THE PROJECT, PROVIDE COST AND SCHEDULE INFORMATION TO NASA AS SPECIFIED IN 3.0 MANAGEMENT, ABOVE. B. PROVIDE DAY-TO-DAY MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION OF THE PROJECT AS DELEGATED BY THE PI TO THE PROJECT MANAGER (PM), INCLUDING MONITORING AND REPORTING TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL STATUS, IMPLEMENTING THE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CONDUCTING MISSION LEVEL REVIEWS AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 4.3, SYSTEM LEVEL REVIEWS. C. CONDUCT REVIEWS FOR ALL PAYLOAD SENSORS, PAYLOAD SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AND ASSOCIATED GSE. D. PERFORM SCIENTIFIC ANALYSES IN SUPPORT OF THE MISSION SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS. E. PERFORM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TO COORDINATE THE DESIGN OF THE INSTRUMENT COMPLEMENT AND SPACECRAFT BUS COMPONENTS AND TO ENSURE THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE SPACE-TO-GROUND AND NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS. F. PERFORM TRADE STUDIES TO ELIMINATE AND MITIGATE RISKS G. DELIVER THE IBEX FLIGHT SEGMENT TO VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE (VAFB), SUPPORT INTEGRATION WITH THE LAUNCH VEHICLE, AND ASSIST THE LAUNCH OPERATIONS H. ESTABLISH THE MISSION CONTROL CENTER (MCC) AND IBEX SCIENCE OPERATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS CENTER (ISOC) INCLUDING ALL COMPUTERS, NETWORKS, AND OPERATING SOFTWARE, INSTRUMENT DATABASES AND PROCEDURES NECESSARY TO FUNCTIONALLY TEST AND LATER CONTROL THE SPACECRAFT I. HOLD SCIENCE TEAM MEETINGS AS WELL AS TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETINGS. J. BASELINE THE SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS AND SCIENCE ANALYSIS PLAN INTO AN IBEX MISSION DEFINITION REQUIREMENTS AGREEMENT (MDRA) AND THE IBEX DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN. K. IMPLEMENT AN APPROVED MISSION ASSURANCE PLAN. L. IMPLEMENT A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNCTION TO VERIFY PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION COMPLIANCE TO THE MISSION SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS. M. DESIGN, FABRICATE, INTEGRATE AND TEST THE PAYLOAD, SPACECRAFT, SOLID ROCKET MOTOR AND LAUNCH VEHICLE ADAPTER, AND INTEGRATE THE IBEX FLIGHT SEGMENT WITH THE LAUNCH VEHICLE. N. IMPLEMENT A SAFETY PROGRAM INCLUDING THE GENERATION OF THE MISSILE SYSTEM PRE-LAUNCH SAFETY PACKAGE (MSPSP). O. SUPPORT LAUNCH, PERFORM ON-ORBIT CHECKOUT, AND ESTABLISH ON-ORBIT DATA ACQUISITION CONTACT WITH THE PAYLOAD. WITHIN THE FIRST 30 DAYS AFTER LAUNCH, INITIAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE CHECKOUT AND VERIFICATION OF SPACECRAFT IN-FLIGHT OPERATION WILL BE PERFORMED. P. PROVIDE THE SERVICES OF THE MCC AND THE ISOC. Q. CONDUCT THE E/PO PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE IDENTIFIED TEAM MEMBERS.$12.1M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Mercer County, NJ· Research & development· Mar 23, 2017 – Jul 17, 2026· NNG17FC93C
  4. Food and Drug Administration· Mercer County, NJ· Research & development· Sep 29, 2022 – Apr 29, 2026· 75F40122C00186
  5. Department of the Army· Mercer County, NJ· Research & development· Aug 22, 2024 – Jan 8, 2026· W912HZ24C0048
  6. Department of the Army· Mercer County, NJ· Research & development· Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 12, 2025· W912HQ26PA002

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY received $147.8M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 613 actions (121 new awards), −18% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences ($19.8M).

Assistance · FY2026
$147.8M
New awards
121
Actions
613
Since FY2021
$1.1B

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 219.9MFY2021
  2. 172.5MFY2022
  3. 178.5MFY2023
  4. 165.8MFY2024
  5. 181.3MFY2025
  6. 147.8MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$137.3M93%
  2. Direct payments$9.2M6.2%
  3. Other assistance$1.4M0.9%

Top programs

  1. 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences$19.8M13%
  2. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$18.2M12%
  3. 93.242 · Mental Health Research Grants$13.7M9.3%
  4. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program$12.1M8.2%
  5. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$8.3M5.6%
  6. 93.310 · Trans-NIH Research Support$8M5.4%
  7. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$7.6M5.2%
  8. 93.865 · Child Health and Human Development Extramural Research$6.4M4.3%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Defense
  3. Department of Commerce
  4. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 93.307 · Minority Health and Health Disparities Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Nov 10, 2020 – Jul 29, 2026· R01HD036916
  2. 11.432 · National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Cooperative Institutes· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jun 21, 2023 – Jul 7, 2026· NA23OAR4320198
  3. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)· National Science Foundation· Project grant· Aug 14, 2024 – Aug 4, 2026· 2444107
  4. 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Sep 6, 2023 – Jul 23, 2026· 2323298
  5. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Apr 26, 2021 – Aug 19, 2026· DESC0007968
  6. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Jul 26, 2021 – Jun 29, 2026· DESC0019370

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $8M (8 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $2.3M (19 subawards)

24 sub-recipients

  1. BOULDER, CO · 1 subaward
  2. MENLO INNOVATIONS LLC$1.6M16%
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  3. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward
  4. DURHAM, NH · 1 subaward
  5. HERBERT OLIVER FUNSTEN III$558.8K5.4%
    LOS ALAMOS, NM · 1 subaward
  6. ANN ARBOR, MI · 2 subawards
  7. ITHACA, NY · 1 subaward
  8. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward
  9. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  10. SEATTLE, WA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.7M (3 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $22M (74 subawards)

43 primes

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 2 subawards
  2. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 5 subawards
  3. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 2 subawards
  4. ROCHESTER, NY · 2 subawards
  5. URBANA, IL · 5 subawards
  6. GAINESVILLE, FL · 1 subaward
  7. LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward
  8. NEW YORK, NY · 2 subawards
  9. NEWARK, NJ · 8 subawards
  10. GOLDEN, CO · 2 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.5% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $187.2M paid out · $22.3M received
  • FY2022: $74.3M paid out · $39.4M received
  • FY2023: $102.3M paid out · $29.9M received
  • FY2024: $38.6M paid out · $32.2M received
  • FY2025: $17M paid out · $25.3M received
  • FY2026: $10.3M paid out · $23.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

147 companies · $429.7M reported

  1. LA JOLLA, CA · 14 subawards
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 21 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. MADISON, WI · 17 subawards

Primes that pay it

105 companies · $173M reported

  1. BOSTON, MA · 15 subawards
  2. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 22 subawards
  3. URBANA, IL · 41 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MCCALLIE ASSOCIATES, INC.$77.7M−24% in FY2026
    BELLEVUE, NE · 7.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. HAMPTON, VA · 7.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. ADVANCED SPACE LLC$83.5M+102% in FY2026
    WESTMINSTER, CO · 7.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.