Federal contractor · LINCOLN, NE

BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA

No contract obligations recorded for BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA in FY2026. Since FY2018: $5,940. It also received $750K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
LF77GRM3FWG5
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA company family: 4 registered entities, $547.6K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKAOMAHA, NE · Family page
    $547.6K
  2. $0
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6KFY2018
  2. -99FY2019

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA received $750K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 6 actions (3 new awards), −80% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.600 · Head Start ($250K).

Assistance · FY2026
$750K
New awards
3
Actions
6
Since FY2021
$21.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 4.6MFY2021
  2. 8MFY2022
  3. 4.5MFY2023
  4. 3.8MFY2025
  5. 750KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$750K100%

Top programs

  1. 93.600 · Head Start$250K33%
  2. 93.596 · Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund$250K33%
  3. 93.872 · Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting$250K33%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 93.596 · Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund· Administration for Children and Families· Cooperative agreement· Aug 5, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 90PH0034

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $3.3M (12 subawards)

8 sub-recipients

  1. OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward
  2. OMAHA, NE · 5 subawards
  3. KEARNEY, NE · 1 subaward
  4. WINNEBAGO TRIBE OF NEBRASKA$87.7K2.7%
    WINNEBAGO, NE · 1 subaward
  5. WAYNE STATE COLLEGE$36.4K1.1%
    WAYNE, NE · 1 subaward
  6. OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward
  7. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward
  8. CRETE, NE · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $2.4M (4 subawards)

4 primes

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward
  2. DAVIS, CA · 1 subaward
  3. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward
  4. BALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $885.3K received
  • FY2022: $75.3K paid out · $877.2K received
  • FY2024: $2.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $463K paid out · $247K received
  • FY2026: $3.3M paid out · $2.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

69 companies · $51.4M reported

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 54 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC · 3 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. BRAINTREE, MA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

44 companies · $28.1M reported

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 65 subawards
  2. LINCOLN, NE · 14 subawards
  3. MISSOULA, MT · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EAGLE HORIZON GROUP INC.$3M−3.8% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. SYNCOPATED ENGINEERING INC$3.6M−84% in FY2026
    ELLICOTT CITY, MD · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesOffice of Procurement Operations · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. ANN ARBOR, MI · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKAAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$340K
9 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.1M
$1.1M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$290K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$300K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$340K
    9 reports
  4. 2026$140K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations29 reports
  2. Agriculture23 reports
  3. Defense15 reports
  4. Health issues15 reports
  5. Consumer issues, safety and products14 reports
  6. Education14 reports
  7. Science and technology11 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES27 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE27 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$690K
    11 reports
  2. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$170K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.