Federal contractor · TOWNSEND, MT
BRANDON T BAKKEN
BRANDON T BAKKEN received $2.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 42 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $14.1M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($2.8M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.8M
- New awards
- 42
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 100%
- UEI
- JJJ2FZYA92S8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 0FY2017
- 608.8KFY2018
- 206.2KFY2019
- 920.2KFY2020
- 869.4KFY2021
- 984.7KFY2022
- 914KFY2023
- 3.6MFY2024
- 3.1MFY2025
- 2.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Forest Service$2.8M100%42 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$2.8M100%
Where the work was performed
- La Plata County, CO$510.5K18%
- St. Louis County, MN$388.4K14%
- Beaverhead County, MT$303.4K11%
- Kootenai County, ID$196.1K7.0%
- Wheeler County, OR$181.5K6.5%
- Montrose County, CO$143.2K5.1%
- Pueblo County, CO$116K4.2%
- Humboldt County, CA$109.9K3.9%
- Valley County, ID$104.7K3.8%
- Shasta County, CA$104.4K3.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $2.8M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions100%US 8.7% · $2.8M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· 1202SB26M2794
- Forest Service· Humboldt County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jul 23, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026· 129J6126M7262
- Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 28, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026· 1202SB26M1600
- Forest Service· Wheeler County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jul 29, 2026 – Jul 29, 2026· 1202SB26M2319
- Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 29, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 1202SB26M1109
- Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 23, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026· 1202SB26M2612
- Forest Service· Kootenai County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Jul 10, 2026 – Jul 10, 2026· 1202SB26M2915
- Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· 1202SB26M1490
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SPECIAL OPERATIONS GROUP, INC.$9.6M−53% in FY2026CODY, WY · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
- SIERRA VALLEY ENTERPRISES LLC$9.3M+235% in FY2026LOYALTON, CA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
- BIG STATE WILDFIRE LLC$9.1M−27% in FY2026FAIRBANKS, AK · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.