Federal contractor · CODY, WY
SPECIAL OPERATIONS GROUP, INC.
SPECIAL OPERATIONS GROUP, INC. received $2.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 33 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.9M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($2.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.1M
- New awards
- 33
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 100%
- UEI
- UKVDB2XYW2K5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.5MFY2017
- 2.7MFY2018
- 1.6MFY2019
- 970KFY2020
- 511.5KFY2021
- 2MFY2022
- 3.2MFY2024
- 4.4MFY2025
- 2.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Forest Service$2.1M100%33 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$2.1M100%
Where the work was performed
- Lake County, OR$497.7K24%
- Clackamas County, OR$422.1K21%
- Coconino County, AZ$324.8K16%
- Santa Barbara County, CA$316K15%
- Chelan County, WA$315K15%
- Carbon County, UT$128.6K6.3%
- Nevada County, CA$46.2K2.2%
- Montrose County, CO$5,5110.3%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $2.1M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions100%US 8.7% · $2.1M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Forest Service· Coconino County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 23, 2026 – Jun 23, 2026· 12024B26M0202
- Forest Service· Clackamas County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026· 12024B26M1683
- Forest Service· Chelan County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 12024B26M1691
- Forest Service· Chelan County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 12024B26M1678
- Forest Service· Clackamas County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026· 12024B26M0899
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SIERRA VALLEY ENTERPRISES LLC$9.3M+235% in FY2026LOYALTON, CA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
- BRANDON T BAKKEN$9.6M−11% in FY2026TOWNSEND, MT · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
- M.A.R. CONTRACTING, LLC$10.2M−62% in FY2026INDEPENDENCE, OR · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.