Federal contractor · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

BRAUN INTERTEC CORP

BRAUN INTERTEC CORP received $113.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($113.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$113.3K
New awards
8
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MNGMDGPGK5N7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 118.8KFY2017
  2. 29.1KFY2018
  3. 20KFY2019
  4. 2.1KFY2020
  5. 86.7KFY2021
  6. 282.6KFY2022
  7. 201.8KFY2023
  8. 44.8KFY2024
  9. 127.1KFY2025
  10. 113.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$88.3K78%
  2. Facilities & utilities$25K22%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $113.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $113.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Clay County, MN· Professional services· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W912ES26FA047
  2. Department of the Army· Dakota County, MN· Professional services· Dec 12, 2024 – Dec 3, 2025· W912ES25P0022
  3. Department of the Army· Hennepin County, MN· Professional services· Apr 24, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· W912ES25F0066
  4. Department of the Army· Cass County, ND· Facilities & utilities· Oct 20, 2025 – Oct 20, 2025· W912ES26FA005
  5. Department of the Army· Cass County, ND· Professional services· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W912ES26FA043
  6. Department of the Army· Houston County, MN· Professional services· Jan 16, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· W912ES25F0029
  7. Department of the Army· Crawford County, WI· Professional services· Apr 9, 2025 – Dec 2, 2025· W912ES25F0050
  8. Department of the Army· Otter Tail County, MN· Professional services· Apr 25, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· W912ES25F0067

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $470.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $519.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $64.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $74.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $1.1M reported

  1. DENVER, CO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. FREDERICK, MD · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TECHKNOWSERV CORP$309.9K−86% in FY2026
    STATE COLLEGE, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. COMPASSQSI, LLC$311.5K−100% in FY2026
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ASHVILLE, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.