Federal contractor · BRISTOL, RI

BRISTOL HARBOR GROUP INC

BRISTOL HARBOR GROUP INC received $617.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards. Since FY2017: $9.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($576.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$617.3K
New awards
5
Sole-source
6.6%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G5W8NZNYN1P6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 910.7KFY2017
  2. 862.2KFY2018
  3. 589.8KFY2019
  4. 1.4MFY2020
  5. 1.3MFY2021
  6. 2.6MFY2022
  7. 790.9KFY2023
  8. 939.8KFY2024
  9. -302.3KFY2025
  10. 617.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$617.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition6.6%
    US 39% · $40.7K
  • Sole-source awards6.6%
    US 30% · $40.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Philadelphia County, PA· Construction & real property· Feb 20, 2024 – Dec 9, 2025· W912BU24F0013
  2. Department of the Army· Cook County, IL· Construction & real property· Sep 13, 2023 – Oct 31, 2025· W912BU23F0046
  3. Department of the Army· Bristol County, RI· Construction & real property· Sep 13, 2021 – Mar 13, 2026· W912BU21F0078
  4. Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· W912BU26FA028
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Madison County, AL· Construction & real property· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· 80MSFC26P0003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $120K received
  • FY2022: $127.5K paid out · $20K received
  • FY2023: $161K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $153.5K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $442.1K reported

  1. SPRING, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SALEM, MA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. OCEAN SPRINGS, MS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $140K reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. R. LOPEZ DE AZUA & ASSOC, INC.$1.3M−70% in FY2026
    SAN JUAN, PR · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BRIDGE DIAGNOSTICS, INC.$1.3M−69% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, CO · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. JMZ ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, PC$1.3M−100% in FY2026
    GLENS FALLS, NY · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.