Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

C2 ALASKA, LLC

C2 ALASKA, LLC received $58.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 73 awards (−7% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $261.1M. Its largest customer was Securities and Exchange Commission ($24.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$58.6M
New awards
73
Sole-source
50%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GAVTYB3AKC29
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.7MFY2021
  2. 27.9MFY2022
  3. 56.7MFY2023
  4. 48.3MFY2024
  5. 63MFY2025
  6. 58.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission$24.9M42%
    27 awards
  2. Social Security Administration$10M17%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Army$5.7M9.8%
    2 awards
  4. Department of the Air Force$5.3M9.1%
    13 awards
  5. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences$4.6M7.9%
    10 awards
  6. Food and Drug Administration$4.5M7.6%
    9 awards
  7. Defense Health Agency$1.8M3.1%
    2 awards
  8. Missile Defense Agency$1.4M2.3%
    1 awards
  9. Departmental Offices$571.2K1.0%
    6 awards
  10. National Institute of Standards and Technology-$179.6K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$43.5M74%
  2. Facilities & utilities$5.7M9.6%
  3. Transportation & logistics$4.5M7.7%
  4. Health & medical$3.7M6.3%
  5. Construction & real property$1.4M2.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$20.2M35%
  2. Bexar County, TX$9.9M17%
  3. Baltimore city, MD$9.6M16%
  4. Montgomery County, MD$9.4M16%
  5. Greene County, OH$4.8M8.1%
  6. Bowie County, TX$2.4M4.1%
  7. Southeast Fairbanks Census Area, AK$1.4M2.3%
  8. Fairfax County, VA$422.8K0.7%
  9. Montgomery County, AL$334K0.6%
  10. New York County, NY$235.9K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition50%
    US 39% · $29.2M
  • Sole-source awards50%
    US 30% · $29.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$5.3M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences$4.6M
    Department of Defense · 4 awards
  3. Departmental Offices$571.2K
    Department of the Interior · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. IPASS 2.0 IN SUPPORT OF ENF$79.8M
    Securities and Exchange Commission· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 3, 2022 – Sep 24, 2026· 50310222F0082
  2. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CASE SERVICES$14.1M
    Social Security Administration· Baltimore city, MD· Professional services· Sep 29, 2025 – Sep 29, 2026· 28321325FDS030158
  3. CUSTODIAL SERVICES$13M
    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences· Montgomery County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Jun 23, 2022 – Jun 2, 2026· HU000122F0030
  4. JANITORIAL SVCS-BASE PERIOD$11.4M
    Department of the Army· Bowie County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Feb 28, 2022 – May 20, 2026· W911RQ22C0004
  5. IPASS 2.0 SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF OSO FOR FOIA$10.2M
    Securities and Exchange Commission· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Mar 29, 2023 – Apr 8, 2026· 50310223F0038
  6. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES$8.8M
    Securities and Exchange Commission· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jun 16, 2022 – Jan 7, 2026· 50310222F0077
  7. PHYSICAL THERAPISTS$8.6M
    Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Health & medical· Sep 5, 2022 – Feb 3, 2026· W81K0022C0004
  8. RESEARCH ASSISTANCE SUPPORT.$8.6M
    Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jun 22, 2022 – May 26, 2026· W81XWH22C0065

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $886.1K paid out · $7.2M received
  • FY2022: $12.5M paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2025: $564.6K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $13.9M reported

  1. SUPERIOR TASKING ADVANTAGE CONTRACTING, INC.$9.1M
    ASHVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  2. CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC$3.4M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. TECHNICA LLC$886.1K
    CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $12.9M reported

  1. CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC$12.9M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 8 subawards · Offices of physicians

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 16 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRAND GROUND ENTERPRISE, LLC$17.8M−20% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 10% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. R2C LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$20.4M−7.1% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 10% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. TUTULU LLC$25.2M+32% in FY2026
    CENTENNIAL, CO · 10% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.