Federal contractor · SAN JOSE, CA

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 26 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $41.8M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($827.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
26
Sole-source
96%
Single offer
3.7%
UEI
NC1VVZ3DJ3K4
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INCSAN JOSE, CA · Family page
    $1.8M
  2. BETA CAE SYSTEMS USA INCFARMINGTON HILLS, MI
    $64.7K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.7MFY2017
  2. 6.5MFY2018
  3. 3.3MFY2019
  4. 4MFY2020
  5. 5.1MFY2021
  6. 3.8MFY2022
  7. 6.5MFY2023
  8. 4.6MFY2024
  9. 2.6MFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 12 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.9M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.8M
  • Sole-source awards96%
    US 30% · $1.8M
  • Single-offer competitions3.7%
    US 8.7% · $68.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 10 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  3. Department of Transportation · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 31, 2023 – Nov 17, 2025· N6893623C0017
  2. Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 18, 2024 – Dec 18, 2025· N0016424FG060
  3. Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Jul 29, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· N0016425FG533
  4. Defense Microelectronics Activity· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Feb 27, 2025 – May 18, 2026· HQ072725FE013
  5. Department of the Air Force· Oneida County, NY· IT & telecom· Dec 3, 2025 – Dec 3, 2025· FA875126P0004
  6. Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Jun 30, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· N0016725P1030
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· May 27, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026· 80NSSC26P0712
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Apr 15, 2026 – May 13, 2026· 80NSSC26P0452

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $444.2K (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. BEDFORD, MA · 1 subaward
  2. GREENVILLE, SC · 2 subawards
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $44.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $18.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $444.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

21 companies · $79.5M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. LEXINGTON, MA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 16 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GREEN HILLS SOFTWARE LLC$7.9M−86% in FY2026
    SANTA BARBARA, CA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersAir Force · Software publishersAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  2. TALKSPACE LLC$2.9M−100% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers
  3. TRAPWIRE INC.$7.1M+1.6% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersArmy · Software publishersAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$180K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$875K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$165K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$410K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$180K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense26 reports
  2. Trade (domestic and foreign)4 reports
  3. Science and technology3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES31 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. PRASAM$440K
    14 reports
  2. Magill Associates, LLC$245K
    13 reports
  3. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$190K
    13 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.