Federal contractor · ANN ARBOR, MI

CAMBRIDGE MICHIGAN LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT LLC

No contract obligations recorded for CAMBRIDGE MICHIGAN LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT LLC in FY2026. Since FY2018: $19.4K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
FNKGTPNGR6E6
Other than small businessNonprofit

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN company family: 3 registered entities, $34.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANANN ARBOR, MI · Family page
    $34.4M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.5KFY2018
  2. 13.9KFY2021

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for CAMBRIDGE MICHIGAN LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT LLC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

637 companies · $761.3M reported

  1. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC · 3 subawards
  2. EAST LANSING, MI · 115 subawards
  3. URBANA, IL · 74 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

316 companies · $907.7M reported

  1. LANSING, MI · 712 subawards
  2. EAST LANSING, MI · 89 subawards
  3. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 20 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 47 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$81M−48% in FY2026
    IOWA CITY, IA · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+6 more
  2. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 4 entities · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services+3 more
  3. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$78M−13% in FY2026
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 3 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Regents of the University of MichiganAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$800K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.3M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$10K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$30K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$800K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$490K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues13 reports
  2. Education12 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations8 reports
  4. Medicare and Medicaid4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES24 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE24 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BGR Government Affairs$740K
    6 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$480K
    6 reports
  3. ALSTON & BIRD LLP$110K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.