Federal contractor · IOWA CITY, IA

THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA

THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA received $17.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 55 awards (−48% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $350.5M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($11.6M). It also received $258.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$17.8M
New awards
55
Sole-source
24%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Z1H9VJS8NG16
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14MFY2017
  2. 15.4MFY2018
  3. 19.6MFY2019
  4. 43.2MFY2020
  5. 22.4MFY2021
  6. 126.4MFY2022
  7. 28.6MFY2023
  8. 28.6MFY2024
  9. 34.6MFY2025
  10. 17.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 36 awards
  4. 6 awards
  5. 3 awards
  6. 2 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$14.2M80%
  2. Health & medical$2.6M14%
  3. Professional services$451.9K2.5%
  4. Education & social services$418.3K2.3%
  5. Construction & real property$133.7K0.7%
  6. Facilities & utilities$20.9K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Kern County, CA$249.2K1.4%
  2. Polk County, IA$5,0400.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition8.6%
    US 39% · $1.5M
  • Sole-source awards24%
    US 30% · $4.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$2.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 14 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THE TANDEM RECONNECTION AND CUSP ELECTRODYNAMICS RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITE (TRACERS) IS PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN RESPONSE TO THE NATIONAL AERONAUTIC AND SPACE ADMINSTRATION'S (NASA) 2016 HELIOPHYSICS SMALL EXPLORER (SMEX) ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY (AO). THIS STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) DESCRIBES THE WORK TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PHASE A (TRACERS) PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES TO PRODUCE THE TRACERS PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY REPORT (CSR) THAT ENCOMPASSES: 1. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR PROGRAM OFFICE (PIPO). 2. INSTRUMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING, INCLUDING INSTRUMENT MISSION ASSURANCE. 3. DESIGN OF A FLIGHT QUALIFIED TRACERS INSTRUMENT MEETING MISSION AND SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS. 4. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF INTEGRATION AND TEST OF THE TRACERS INSTRUMENT FLIGHT SYSTEM. 5. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF ESSENTIAL FIELD OPERATIONS. 6. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF LAUNCH OPERATIONS, FLIGHT OPERATIONS. 7. DEVELOP PLANS FOR AND LEAD THE TRACERS SCIENCE INVESTIGATION, AS WELL AS THE GENERATION OF RESULTING DATA PRODUCTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A BRIEFING ON THE TRACERS SCIENCE AND SCIENCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT THE PHASE A SITE VISIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ORGANIZATION CHART DEFINING THE CONTRACTOR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, REPORTING PROCEDURES, AND LINES OF AUTHORITY. PARTICIPATE IN DEFINING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR PIPO AND THE NASA EXPLORERS PROGRAM OFFICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP A TRACERS INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT AND A TRACERS MISSION SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP DETAILED BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND TECHNICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT IN-DEPTH INSTRUMENT-LEVEL REVIEWS OF THE PROPOSED INSTRUMENT DESIGN. CONDUCT ESSENTIAL TRADE STUDIES, ANALYSES, MODELING AND SIMULATIONS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAD THE SCIENCE TEAM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP AN INSTRUMENT-LEVEL TEST PLAN AND PARTICIPATE IN PLANNING FOR INTEGRATION AND TEST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A DETAILED INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE COVERING ALL MISSION PHASES, LISTING MAJOR MILESTONES AND INCLUDING A DEFINED CRITICAL PATH AND SCHEDULE RESERVES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE UPDATED INSTRUMENT BUDGETS AND REVIEW AND APPROVE THE OVERALL TRACERS BUDGET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT THE CONCEPT STUDY REPORT.$188.3M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Johnson County, IA· Research & development· Mar 5, 2018 – Sep 28, 2026· 80GSFC18C0008
  2. National Institutes of Health· Johnson County, IA· Research & development· May 1, 2018 – Sep 4, 2026· 75N91018F00001
  3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration· Johnson County, IA· Research & development· Sep 12, 2022 – Apr 14, 2026· 693JJ922F00118N
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Johnson County, IA· Health & medical· Mar 23, 2022 – Jun 23, 2026· 36C26322C0051
  5. Department of the Air Force· Johnson County, IA· Research & development· Jul 26, 2022 – Feb 11, 2026· FA865022C7212
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Johnson County, IA· Health & medical· Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 22, 2026· 36C26325C0001
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Johnson County, IA· Health & medical· Mar 20, 2023 – Sep 3, 2026· 36C26323C0032
  8. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration· Johnson County, IA· IT & telecom· Sep 25, 2020 – Jan 5, 2026· 693JJ920F000153

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA received $258.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1,110 actions (140 new awards), +3.1% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.837 · Cardiovascular Diseases Research ($29M).

Assistance · FY2026
$258.6M
New awards
140
Actions
1,110
Since FY2021
$1.6B

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 309.1MFY2021
  2. 250.4MFY2022
  3. 269MFY2023
  4. 282.6MFY2024
  5. 250.8MFY2025
  6. 258.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$232.3M90%
  2. Direct payments$26.3M10%

Top programs

  1. 93.837 · Cardiovascular Diseases Research$29M11%
  2. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research$25.2M9.8%
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$24.3M9.4%
  4. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders$18.7M7.2%
  5. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$9.4M3.6%
  6. 93.867 · Vision Research$8.3M3.2%
  7. 93.121 · Oral Diseases and Disorders Research$7.4M2.9%
  8. 93.173 · Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders$7M2.7%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Health and Human Services
  3. Department of Health and Human Services
  4. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 93.397 · Cancer Centers Support Grants· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Apr 20, 2021 – Jun 3, 2026· P30CA086862
  2. 93.143 · Niehs Superfund Hazardous Substances_basic Research and Education· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Jan 28, 2021 – Feb 6, 2026· P42ES013661
  3. 93.173 · Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Nov 25, 2020 – May 26, 2026· P50DC000242
  4. 93.262 · Occupational Safety and Health Program· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· Grant· Jun 3, 2021 – Sep 29, 2026· T42OH008491
  5. 93.113 · Environmental Health· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Oct 13, 2020 – Sep 23, 2026· P30ES005605
  6. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Aug 10, 2021 – Aug 21, 2026· U01NS077352

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $42.1M (33 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $19.7M (205 subawards)

106 sub-recipients

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 7 subawards
  2. BERKELEY, CA · 10 subawards
  3. LOS ANGELES, CA · 7 subawards
  4. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 2 subawards
  5. ATHENS, GA · 1 subaward
  6. DURHAM, NH · 2 subawards
  7. NASHVILLE, TN · 4 subawards
  8. WEST LAFAYETTE, IN · 3 subawards
  9. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 8 subawards
  10. PITTSBURGH, PA · 4 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.3M (6 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $77.3M (191 subawards)

82 primes

  1. WINDSOR HEIGHTS, IA · 38 subawards
  2. DES MOINES, IA · 3 subawards
  3. DES MOINES, IA · 19 subawards
  4. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 2 subawards
  5. DURHAM, NC · 3 subawards
  6. BOULDER, CO · 4 subawards
  7. DENVER, CO · 1 subaward
  8. DAVIS, CA · 1 subaward
  9. STANFORD, CA · 7 subawards
  10. TUSCALOOSA, AL · 4 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 236% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $26.6M paid out · $74.9M received
  • FY2022: $67.5M paid out · $133.7M received
  • FY2023: $31.7M paid out · $60.4M received
  • FY2024: $41.9M paid out · $44.1M received
  • FY2025: $37.6M paid out · $42.4M received
  • FY2026: $61.8M paid out · $81.5M received
  • FY2027: $0 paid out · $236.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

284 companies · $266.9M reported

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 30 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. OAKLAND, CA · 38 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BISON AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE LLC$6.9M
    SAVANNA, IL · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

179 companies · $436.8M reported

  1. DES MOINES, IA · 69 subawards
  2. WINDSOR HEIGHTS, IA · 48 subawards
  3. DES MOINES, IA · 3 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 26 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NEW HORIZONS AERONAUTICS, LLC$38.4M−9.7% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. INFLEQTION QUANTUM, LLC$57.3M−7.2% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, CO · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  3. CORNELL TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$32.4M−33% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • UNIVERSITY OF IOWAAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$340K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$940K
$940K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$230K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$210K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$340K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$160K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Agriculture14 reports
  2. Arts and entertainment14 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  4. Civil rights and civil liberties14 reports
  5. Defense14 reports
  6. Economics and economic development14 reports
  7. Education14 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.