Federal contractor · OTTAWA

CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION received $805.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1,075 awards (−42% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.7B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($514.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$805.1M
New awards
1,075
Sole-source
80%
Single offer
0.9%
UEI
FA38CTVQM319
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 464.8MFY2017
  2. 507.4MFY2018
  3. 621.5MFY2019
  4. 701.4MFY2020
  5. 625.8MFY2021
  6. 635.4MFY2022
  7. 910.1MFY2023
  8. 1.1BFY2024
  9. 1.4BFY2025
  10. 805.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$514.6M64%
    51 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$102.8M13%
    47 awards
  3. Defense Logistics Agency$97.8M12%
    821 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$83.8M10%
    143 awards
  5. Defense Contract Management Agency$5.9M0.7%
    11 awards
  6. Defense Media Activity$83.9K0.0%
    1 awards
  7. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$581.5M71%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$97.2M12%
  3. Equipment maintenance$80.6M9.9%
  4. Transportation & logistics$22.3M2.7%
  5. Health & medical$18.8M2.3%
  6. IT & telecom$12.1M1.5%
  7. Education & social services$798.2K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$794.1M99%
  2. Okaloosa County, FL$7.6M0.9%
  3. Ventura County, CA$1.7M0.2%
  4. Oklahoma County, OK$1.2M0.1%
  5. Miami-Dade County, FL$212.1K0.0%
  6. Bay County, FL$171.2K0.0%
  7. Anne Arundel County, MD$83.9K0.0%
  8. Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT$64.5K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition81%
    US 39% · $651.5M
  • Sole-source awards80%
    US 30% · $644.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.9%
    US 8.7% · $6.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$8,250

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$503.4M
    Department of Defense · 5 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$67.7M
    Department of Defense · 31 awards
  3. Defense Logistics Agency$59.5M
    Department of Defense · 242 awards
  4. Department of the Air Force$14.2M
    Department of Defense · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. LAV-25(S) A2 - 4TH BDE$2.3B
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 5, 2016 – Feb 11, 2026· W56HZV10C0077
  2. THE PROCUREMENT OF 150 FLAT-BOTTOM-HULL STRYKER VEHICLES UNDER FMS CASE FOR REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA.$677.8M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 31, 2025 – Apr 27, 2026· W912CH25C0004
  3. UKRAINE: INCREASE PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF M31-TYPE TRIPLE BASE PROPELLANT.$628.5M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 28, 2023 – Feb 27, 2026· W15QKN23F0644
  4. DELIVERY ORDER FOR M31A2 PROPELLANT FOR THE 155MM MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGE SYSTEM (MACS) M31A2 PROPELLING CHARGE.$323.7M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 12, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· W15QKN25F0214
  5. DELIVERY ORDER FOR M31A2 PROPELLANT FOR THE 155MM MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGES SYSTEMS (MACS) M32A2 PROPELLING CHARGE.$249.1M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 23, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· W15QKN25F0248
  6. PROCURE M31A2 PROPELLANT FOR THE 155MM MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGES SYSTEM (MACS) M232A2 PROPELLING CHARGE.$190.6M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 27, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· W15QKN23F0306
  7. DELIVERY ORDER FOR M31A2 PROPELLANT FOR THE 155MM MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGES SYSTEM (MACS) M232A2 PROPELLING CHARGE FOR DOD STOCKPILE REPLENISHMENT IN SUPPORT OF UKRAINE.$96.6M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 19, 2023 – May 13, 2026· W15QKN23F0460
  8. AWARD BASE CONTRACT FOR THE 120MM HE/FRPC LAP CONTRACT TO CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION WHOSE SUBCONTRACTOR IS GENERAL DYNAMICS, CANADA$81.9M
    Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 23, 2019 – Apr 14, 2026· W15QKN19C0057

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $0 (245 subawards)

32 sub-recipients

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $30.4M paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2022: $82.8M paid out · $8.7M received
  • FY2023: $13.6M paid out · $5.4M received
  • FY2024: $27.5M paid out · $37.2M received
  • FY2025: $61.7M paid out · $34.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

26 companies · $183.3M reported

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$63.7M
    GREENVILLE, TX · 43 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC.$42.1M
    NEWTOWN, PA · 22 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. MTU MAINTENANCE BERLIN- BRANDENBURG GMBH$17.8M
    LUDWIGSFELDE, DEU · 21 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $57.1M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$50.6M
    GROTON, CT · 21 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$4.7M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. LEIDOS, INC.$1.7M
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 68 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMERICAN RHEINMETALL VEHICLES, LLC$569.2M−40% in FY2026
    AUBURN HILLS, MI · 6 entities · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturingArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. AM GENERAL LLC$2.5B−89% in FY2026
    SOUTH BEND, IN · 2 entities · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. KONGSBERG DEFENCE & AEROSPACE AS$2B+11% in FY2026
    KONGSBERG, NOR · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.