Federal contractor · GREENVILLE, TX

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. received $1.2B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 165 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $15.9B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1B).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2B
New awards
165
Sole-source
78%
Single offer
4.6%
UEI
RDFKNPZNQ8E3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

154 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $6.1B in FY2026 together.

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.GREENVILLE, TX · Family page
    $1.2B
  2. HARRIS CORPORATIONPOTTSTOWN, PA
    $1B
  3. $460.4M
  4. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $380.7M
  5. $377.5M
  6. $359.3M
  7. $339.6M
  8. $335.1M
  9. $187.1M
  10. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $161.7M
  11. $131.7M
  12. $115.4M
  13. $102.2M
  14. $91.9M
  15. L3 TECHNOLOGIES INCMILLERSVILLE, MD
    $88.4M
  16. $84.9M
  17. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $82.8M
  18. $79.6M
  19. $56M
  20. $54.6M
Show all 154 members
  1. $53M
  2. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.LONDONDERRY, NH
    $43.8M
  3. $37.3M
  4. $34.6M
  5. $32.8M
  6. $30.7M
  7. $22.1M
  8. $21M
  9. $15.2M
  10. $12.5M
  11. $11.2M
  12. $11M
  13. ACRON AVIATION, INC.GRAND RAPIDS, MI
    $9.6M
  14. $8.5M
  15. $7.2M
  16. $6.7M
  17. $6.6M
  18. $6.4M
  19. $5.7M
  20. $5.5M
  21. $3.4M
  22. $2.5M
  23. $2.4M
  24. CALZONI S.R.L.CALDERARA DI RENO, ITA
    $2M
  25. $1.5M
  26. $1.4M
  27. WESCAM USA, INC.SANTA ROSA, CA
    $1.4M
  28. $951.2K
  29. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SOUTH SALT LAKE, UT
    $792.3K
  30. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.WILMINGTON, MA
    $333.4K
  31. $202.6K
  32. WESCAM INC.WATERDOWN, CAN
    $121.7K
  33. $112.6K
  34. L3 TECHNOLOGIES INCSOUTH SALT LAKE, UT
    $112.4K
  35. L3 TECHNOLOGIES INCFALL RIVER, MA
    $110.3K
  36. $87.8K
  37. $86.3K
  38. $2,216
  39. $1,570
  40. $500
  41. $0
  42. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INCRANCHO CORDOVA, CA
    $0
  43. $0
  44. $0
  45. $0
  46. $0
  47. $0
  48. $0
  49. $0
  50. $0
  51. $0
  52. EDO CORPORATIONSALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $0
  53. $0
  54. $0
  55. ELECTRODYNAMICS INCCINCINNATI, OH
    $0
  56. $0
  57. EVI TECHNOLOGY LLCCOLUMBIA, MD
    $0
  58. EXELIS INC.LOS ANGELES, CA
    $0
  59. $0
  60. HARRIS CORPORATIONVAN NUYS, CA
    $0
  61. HARRIS CORPORATIONREDWOOD CITY, CA
    $0
  62. $0
  63. $0
  64. $0
  65. JARIET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.REDONDO BEACH, CA
    $0
  66. $0
  67. $0
  68. $0
  69. $0
  70. $0
  71. $0
  72. $0
  73. $0
  74. $0
  75. $0
  76. $0
  77. $0
  78. $0
  79. $0
  80. $0
  81. $0
  82. $0
  83. $0
  84. $0
  85. $0
  86. $0
  87. $0
  88. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SAN CARLOS, CA
    $0
  89. $0
  90. $0
  91. $0
  92. $0
  93. $0
  94. $0
  95. $0
  96. $0
  97. $0
  98. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.PITTSBURGH, PA
    $0
  99. $0
  100. $0
  101. $0
  102. $0
  103. $0
  104. $0
  105. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.VANDENBERG AFB, CA
    $0
  106. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
    $0
  107. $0
  108. $0
  109. $0
  110. $0
  111. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
    $0
  112. $0
  113. $0
  114. MANU KAI LLCHONOLULU, HI
    $0
  115. MITEQ, INCHAUPPAUGE, NY
    $0
  116. $0
  117. PACORD INCPORTSMOUTH, VA
    $0
  118. $0
  119. PERATON INC.BELLEVUE, NE
    $0
  120. $0
  121. $0
  122. $0
  123. $0
  124. $0
  125. -$2.00
  126. -$7,994
  127. -$15.9K
  128. -$18.9K
  129. -$70.2K
  130. -$107K
  131. -$111.4K
  132. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INCDAYTONA BEACH, FL
    -$112.9K
  133. -$860K
  134. -$4.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7BFY2017
  2. 2BFY2018
  3. 1.9BFY2019
  4. 1.5BFY2020
  5. 1.5BFY2021
  6. 1.6BFY2022
  7. 1.5BFY2023
  8. 1.5BFY2024
  9. 1.6BFY2025
  10. 1.2BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 122 awards
  2. 34 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. U.S. Coast Guard$846.2K0.1%
    4 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$324M27%
  2. Equipment maintenance$309.6M26%
  3. Professional services$237.3M20%
  4. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$209.7M18%
  5. IT & telecom$53.1M4.5%
  6. Research & development$45.2M3.8%
  7. Transportation & logistics$3.6M0.3%
  8. Education & social services$1.1M0.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition83%
    US 39% · $976.7M
  • Sole-source awards78%
    US 30% · $921.9M
  • Single-offer competitions4.6%
    US 8.7% · $54.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.6%
    US 5.1% · $7.3M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 22 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  4. Department of Homeland Security · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. BIG SAFARI$310.3M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 2, 2020 – Jan 29, 2026· FA862020F4858
  2. Department of the Air Force· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 3, 2017 – Apr 27, 2026· FA862018F4801
  3. AMSS HCX$266.7M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Hunt County, TX· IT & telecom· Aug 16, 2018 – Apr 8, 2026· HC101318C0002
  4. Department of the Air Force· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 24, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· FA863725FB005
  5. BIG SAFARI$249.3M
    Department of the Air Force· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 1, 2019 – Mar 23, 2026· FA862019F4868
  6. BIG SAFARI$240.2M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 28, 2019 – Jan 28, 2026· FA862019F4872
  7. Department of the Air Force· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 30, 2017 – Jan 29, 2026· FA862017F4757
  8. Department of the Air Force· Hunt County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 12, 2024 – Apr 21, 2026· FA863724FB001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $60.8M (163 subawards)

97 sub-recipients

  1. AMITYVILLE, NY · 1 subaward
  2. EDINBURGH, GBR · 1 subaward
  3. LITTLETON, CO · 12 subawards
  4. HAWTHORNE, CA · 4 subawards
  5. NORTH SIOUX CITY, SD · 2 subawards
  6. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards
  7. STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 6 subawards
  8. BOULDER, CO · 3 subawards
  9. CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 2 subawards
  10. FARMINGDALE, NY · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $19.7M (8 subawards)

5 primes

  1. NASHUA, NH · 2 subawards
  2. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward
  4. POWAY, CA · 1 subaward
  5. SAN JOSE, CA · 3 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 5.1% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $396.1M paid out · $12.6M received
  • FY2022: $228.1M paid out · $2.5M received
  • FY2023: $4.1B paid out · $20.4M received
  • FY2024: $192M paid out · $71.4M received
  • FY2025: $349.8M paid out · $109.6M received
  • FY2026: $60.8M paid out · $19.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,936 companies · $39.2T reported

  1. STOW, MA · 63 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. USA MACHINE INC.$3.9B
    ROYSE CITY, TX · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 268 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

121 companies · $33.5B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 3,138 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 622 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 213 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+10 more
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.1B−18% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 18 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing+2 more
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$22.3B−44% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 84 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. (154 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Harris CorporationAI match · 100%
  • Jariet TechnologiesAI match · 100%
  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
  • L-3 Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • L3 Harris Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • NV5 GeospatialAI match · 99%
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INCAI match · 98%
  • L-3 Harris Technologies Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.1M
38 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$8.9M
$8.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$777.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.9M
    44 reports
  2. 2024$2.3M
    32 reports
  3. 2025$2.1M
    38 reports
  4. 2026$1.6M
    19 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense92 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations59 reports
  3. Science and technology44 reports
  4. Transportation28 reports
  5. Aerospace17 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines15 reports
  7. Natural resources15 reports
  8. Intelligence and surveillance14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES94 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE91 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Science Partners LLC$750K
    15 reports
  2. American Defense International, Inc.$520K
    12 reports
  3. The McKeon Group, Inc.$360K
    11 reports
  4. The Nickles Group, LLC$350K
    5 reports
  5. Velocity Government Relations, LLC$297.7K
    12 reports
  6. McAllister & Quinn, LLC$210K
    6 reports
  7. BALLARD PARTNERS$190K
    8 reports
  8. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$190K
    4 reports

14 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$429K55%
  2. Democratic$345.5K44%
  3. Other or none$3,0000.4%

PACs sponsored

  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC$1.6M raised this cycle
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC PAC$96.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.