Federal contractor · LONDON

CAPITAL ECONOMICS (N.A.) LIMITED

CAPITAL ECONOMICS (N.A.) LIMITED received $81.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.2M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service ($44.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$81.6K
New awards
4
Sole-source
86%
Single offer
14%
UEI
PUY7J9G89AE5
Parent company
CE TOPCO LIMITED
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 92.7KFY2017
  2. 55.6KFY2018
  3. 118.3KFY2019
  4. 127.7KFY2020
  5. 144.8KFY2021
  6. 164.4KFY2022
  7. 148.6KFY2023
  8. 144.4KFY2024
  9. 142.7KFY2025
  10. 81.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$44.9K55%
  2. Professional services$36.8K45%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$11.8K14%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $81.6K
  • Sole-source awards86%
    US 30% · $69.9K
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.7% · $11.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Energy · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Research Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jul 22, 2022 – Apr 15, 2026· 1232SA22P0063
  2. Office of the Secretary· Forsyth County, GA· IT & telecom· Apr 27, 2022 – Nov 18, 2025· 1331L522P13210039
  3. Department of Energy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 26, 2026 – Jun 26, 2026· 89303026PEI000130
  4. Office of the Secretary· Professional services· Apr 15, 2026 – Apr 15, 2026· 1331L526P13210012

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. HIGHLAND PARK, IL · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. RARESTEP, INC.$264.9K−3.6% in FY2026
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.