Federal contractor · DAYTON, OH

CDO TECHNOLOGIES INC

CDO TECHNOLOGIES INC received $5.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $380.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($5.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.2M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.1%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
XZPLFFXMV1K9
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 72.4MFY2017
  2. 56.9MFY2018
  3. 65.4MFY2019
  4. 41.2MFY2020
  5. 61MFY2021
  6. 38.9MFY2022
  7. 17.3MFY2023
  8. 13.6MFY2024
  9. 8.3MFY2025
  10. 5.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$4M76%
  2. IT & telecom$1.2M24%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$6,6230.1%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.1%
    US 39% · $6,623
  • Sole-source awards0.1%
    US 30% · $6,623
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· Professional services· May 31, 2022 – Apr 22, 2026· FA489022F0040
  2. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· IT & telecom· Jun 29, 2022 – May 21, 2026· FA850122P0012
  3. Department of the Army· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· Jul 22, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· W9133L24FA019
  4. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 10, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026· W519TC25FA213
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Montgomery County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 28, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· SPE4A726P1469
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· HQ085926FE025

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $8.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $2.5M paid out · $6.2M received
  • FY2023: $7.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $5.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $2M paid out · $114.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

10 companies · $26.2M reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 4 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. WAKEFIELD, MA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $6.3M reported

  1. BURLINGTON, MA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. DAYTON, OH · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ADVANCED SYSTEMS DESIGN, INC.$17.1M+35% in FY2026
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. REFERENTIA SYSTEMS INC$18.4M−100% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. APPLIED INSIGHT, LLC$15.2M−31% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 2 entities · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Wired telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.