Federal contractor · BURLINGTON, MA

INTERACTIVE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC

INTERACTIVE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC received $30.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−62% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $353.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($20.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$30.6M
New awards
9
Sole-source
10%
Single offer
2.6%
UEI
FECDBHGKD452
Parent company
HERCULES EMPLOYER LLC
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.3MFY2017
  2. 21.5MFY2018
  3. 19.7MFY2019
  4. 14.1MFY2020
  5. 38.2MFY2021
  6. 21.9MFY2022
  7. 47.5MFY2023
  8. 63.5MFY2024
  9. 79.8MFY2025
  10. 30.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$20.4M67%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$5.8M19%
    2 awards
  3. Federal Aviation Administration$3.2M10%
    1 awards
  4. Department of Education$1.1M3.7%
    1 awards
  5. Washington Headquarters Services$32.5K0.1%
    2 awards
  6. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$17.3M57%
  2. IT & telecom$13.2M43%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Middlesex County, MA$21.1M69%
  2. Bexar County, TX$5.8M19%
  3. Madison County, AL$2.5M8.3%
  4. Rockingham County, NH$1.1M3.7%
  5. Alexandria city, VA$704K2.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition13%
    US 39% · $4M
  • Sole-source awards10%
    US 30% · $3.2M
  • Single-offer competitions2.6%
    US 8.8% · $809.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICE FOR U.S. ARMY COMBAT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT COMMAND, AVIATION AND MISSILE CENTER, AVIATION AND MISSILE CENTER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICE, GENERAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIONS,$122.1M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· IT & telecom· Oct 26, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· W31P4Q23F0020
  2. THIS TASK ORDER IS ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RS3 MA IDIQ CONTRACT W15P7T19D0207 FOR THE ACQUISITION OF DATA SCIENCE ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE ARMY FUTURES COMMAND DATA PLATFORM DIVISION.$40.3M
    Department of the Army· Middlesex County, MA· Professional services· Apr 25, 2024 – Jun 8, 2026· W15P7T24F0049
  3. A1 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ACTIVITY (DTA) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) OPERATIONS SUPPORT (OPS) II COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES$11.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jul 10, 2025 – May 18, 2026· FA701425F0180
  4. EITSS$7.4M
    Federal Aviation Administration· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· May 29, 2024 – Jul 24, 2026· 693KA924C00021
  5. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET SUPPORT$6.3M
    Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 29, 2020 – Feb 11, 2026· HQ003420F0282
  6. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AWARD IS TO PROVIDE FSA WITH ENTERPRISE BUSINESS COLLABORATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.$3M
    Department of Education· Rockingham County, NH· IT & telecom· Jun 26, 2024 – Sep 25, 2026· 91003124F0012
  7. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET SUPPORT$704K
    Washington Headquarters Services· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· HQ003426FE018
  8. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL SERVICE AND SUPPORT FOR CYBER SECURITY EXPERTISE IN SUPPORT OF THE TRANSITION TO THE CLOUD FOR HQ AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND (AETC)/FM AETC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS SUITE (AFMTS).$252.2K
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Sep 15, 2025 – May 21, 2026· FA301625F0413

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2022: $11.5M paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $11.5M reported

  1. CDO TECHNOLOGIES INC$6.2M
    DAYTON, OH · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BUSINESS ENABLED ACQUISITION AND TECHNOLOGY, INC.$4.4M
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. FTS FEDERAL, INC.$592.4K
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $8.5M reported

  1. LEIDOS, INC.$5.6M
    RESTON, VA · 13 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$2.2M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. BELL TEXTRON INC$489.5K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALAMO-EVERGREEN JV LLC$84.2M−64% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BUSINESS MISSION EDGE, LLC$109.2M−67% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SHERPA 6 INC$106.1M−42% in FY2026
    LITTLETON, CO · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.