Federal contractor · MARLTON, NJ

CENTURUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC

CENTURUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC received $41.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 30 awards (−25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $420.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($41.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$41.7M
New awards
30
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
47%
UEI
RJUFNTKG8D91
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 37.4MFY2017
  2. 47.1MFY2018
  3. 35.7MFY2019
  4. 29.5MFY2020
  5. 32.3MFY2021
  6. 33.8MFY2022
  7. 59.9MFY2023
  8. 47.9MFY2024
  9. 55.4MFY2025
  10. 41.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$41.7M100.0%
    29 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$32M77%
  2. Professional services$9.7M23%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$33.6M81%
  2. Burlington County, NJ$8.9M21%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition47%
    US 39% · $19.5M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions47%
    US 8.7% · $19.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SATELLITE COMMUNICATION (SATCOM) CAPABILITY-BASE (CB) IN-SERVICE ENGINEERING ACTIVITY (ISEA) SUPPORT$26M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Nov 20, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· N6600125F3501
  2. SATELLITE COMMUNICATION (SATCOM)-C5ISR PROGRAMS AND CAPABILITY BASED IN-SERVICE ENGINEERING ACTIVITY (CB-ISEA) SUPPORT$20.1M
    Department of the Navy· Burlington County, NJ· Equipment maintenance· May 5, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· N6523625F3013
  3. SATCOM CB-ISEA, NON-ISEA, AND FRB ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT$15.2M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Mar 11, 2020 – Feb 18, 2026· N6523620F0253
  4. LABOR HOURS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SUPPORT, LOGISTICAL SUPPORT, AND OTHER TECHNICAL SUPPORT FUNCTIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE PWS.$14.6M
    Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· May 6, 2020 – Apr 29, 2026· N6523620F0424
  5. NAVSUP WSS DEPOT MAINTENANCE FY26 Q1 WORKLOAD BY USE OF TECHNICAL DIRECTION LETTERS BEGINNING WITH TDL 31-00.$12M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Oct 8, 2025 – Oct 8, 2025· N6600126F0003
  6. NAVAL SUPPLY WEAPON SYSTEM SUPPORT (NAVSUP WSS) DEPOT MAINTENANCE FY26 Q1 AND Q2 WORKLOAD OF DEPOT-LEVEL REPAIRABLE ITEMS (DLRS) TO PROVIDE READY FOR ISSUE (RFI) A CONDITION ASSETS.$7.5M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jan 12, 2026 – Jan 12, 2026· N6600126F8575
  7. DEPOT 0033 - NAVAL SUPPLY WEAPON SYSTEM SUPPORT DEPOT LEVEL REPAIRABLE ITEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EFFORTS TO SUPPORT THE DEPOT OVERHAUL AND MANUFACTURE OF C4I SYSTEMS READY FOR ISSUE CONDITION A ASSETS.$3M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Feb 25, 2026 – Feb 25, 2026· N6600126F8671
  8. DEPOT COMPOUND SUPPORT TO0030$2.8M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 24, 2025 – Nov 17, 2025· N6600125F0905

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $311.9K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $25.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $9.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $10.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $52.5M reported

  1. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$50.7M
    ATLANTA, GA · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KOAM ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.$1.2M
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. V2X SYSTEMS LLC$345.9K
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY FORUM, LTD.$71.6M−36% in FY2026
    FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. VT MILCOM INC.$171.9M−65% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. SYNECTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.$59.5M−19% in FY2026
    OXNARD, CA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.