Federal contractor · ATLANTA, GA

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION received $327.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 94 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.3B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($260.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$327.5M
New awards
94
Sole-source
1.4%
Single offer
42%
UEI
FAK7LNGRNAN5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 233.4MFY2017
  2. 271.3MFY2018
  3. 309.2MFY2019
  4. 334.4MFY2020
  5. 302.6MFY2021
  6. 288.2MFY2022
  7. 336.9MFY2023
  8. 421.8MFY2024
  9. 498MFY2025
  10. 327.5MFY2026
  11. -273.5KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 56 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 11 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 14 awards
  6. 3 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$231.6M71%
  2. Equipment maintenance$48.7M15%
  3. IT & telecom$20.3M6.2%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$19.7M6.0%
  5. Construction & real property$4.6M1.4%
  6. Education & social services$2.3M0.7%
  7. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$710.6K0.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition43%
    US 39% · $140.6M
  • Sole-source awards1.4%
    US 30% · $4.7M
  • Single-offer competitions42%
    US 8.7% · $136M
  • Urgency justifications3.4%
    US 5.1% · $11M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Nov 15, 2019 – Dec 17, 2025· N6523620F3907
  2. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Dec 9, 2019 – Mar 25, 2026· N6523620F3910
  3. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Dec 18, 2024 – May 29, 2026· N6523625F3001
  4. Department of the Navy· Cobb County, GA· Professional services· Sep 28, 2022 – Jun 12, 2026· N6523622F3027
  5. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· Sep 7, 2023 – Jun 2, 2026· N6523623F3028
  6. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· Feb 6, 2024 – May 14, 2026· N6523624F3014
  7. Federal Acquisition Service· Alexandria city, VA· Professional services· May 29, 2025 – Oct 6, 2026· 47QFCA25F0020
  8. Department of the Navy· Cobb County, GA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 23, 2024 – May 15, 2026· N6893624F0760

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $47.1M (103 subawards)

63 sub-recipients

  1. KIHOMAC INC$7.1M15%
    RESTON, VA · 3 subawards
  2. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. SERCO INC$2.9M6.2%
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards
  4. MC LEAN, VA · 2 subawards
  5. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards
  6. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 2 subawards
  7. SUFFOLK, VA · 2 subawards
  8. SUFFOLK, VA · 3 subawards
  9. HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards
  10. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 4 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $6.8M (6 subawards)

6 primes

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward
  2. MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  3. NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward
  4. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 1 subaward
  5. EVANS, GA · 1 subaward
  6. WICHITA, KS · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 14% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $203.7M paid out · $23.3M received
  • FY2022: $176.8M paid out · $15.3M received
  • FY2023: $94.7M paid out · $29.2M received
  • FY2024: $139.2M paid out · $12.2M received
  • FY2025: $150.6M paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2026: $47.1M paid out · $6.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

358 companies · $812.1M reported

  1. MARLTON, NJ · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. NEWTOWN, PA · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GROTON, CT · 39 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

25 companies · $90.4M reported

  1. FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. GROTON, CT · 12 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FIDELITY TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC$465.3M−5.7% in FY2026
    READING, PA · 2 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS, INC.$981.9M−6.9% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Other professional, scientific, and technical services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Scientific Research CorporationAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$200K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$660K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$170K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$170K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$200K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense27 reports
  2. Accounting1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC$440K
    14 reports
  2. Atlantic Strategies Group LLC$220K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.