Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

CGH TECHNOLOGIES INC

CGH TECHNOLOGIES INC received $1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $100.6M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HK6NU3RTN6K3
Small businessWoman-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.3M in FY2026 together.

  1. CGH TECHNOLOGIES INCWASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $1.3M
  2. CRIA GROUP LPWASHINGTON, DC
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14.4MFY2017
  2. 17MFY2018
  3. 11.3MFY2019
  4. 10.4MFY2020
  5. 7.5MFY2021
  6. 9.4MFY2022
  7. 10MFY2023
  8. 11.2MFY2024
  9. 8.1MFY2025
  10. 1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Nov 29, 2018 – Jul 23, 2026· 693KA919F00009
  2. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Aug 12, 2022 – Sep 21, 2026· 693KA922F00158
  3. Federal Aviation Administration· Alameda County, CA· Professional services· Jun 7, 2023 – Dec 9, 2025· 697DCK23C00224
  4. Federal Aviation Administration· Miami-Dade County, FL· Professional services· Sep 21, 2023 – Dec 15, 2025· 697DCK23C00402
  5. Federal Aviation Administration· Honolulu County, HI· Professional services· Jun 21, 2023 – Dec 15, 2025· 697DCK23C00225
  6. Federal Aviation Administration· Fulton County, GA· Professional services· May 16, 2024 – Dec 15, 2025· 697DCK24C00185
  7. Federal Aviation Administration· Bernalillo County, NM· Professional services· Sep 14, 2023 – Dec 15, 2025· 697DCK23C00383

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $757.4K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $34.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $9.5M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 31 subawards · Investigation and security services
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 6 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IT WORKS! INC.$18.7M+3.5% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ASCENT CONSULTING CO$21.9M−43% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  3. BOSTON, MA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.