Federal contractor · NINETY SIX, SC

CHANDLER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.

CHANDLER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. received $16.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+2,325% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $60.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($16.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.5M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
C87FBZZ9D341
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 43MFY2024
  2. 680.1KFY2025
  3. 16.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$16.5M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$16.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Charleston County, SC$16.5M99.9%
  2. Orangeburg County, SC$21K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ORANGEBURG BERKELEY PHASE 2 REACH WATER LINE INSTALLATION$23.3M
    Department of the Army· Orangeburg County, SC· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2024 – Nov 17, 2025· W912HP24C0008
  2. FY25 LAKE MARION CAMERON REACH WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION$16.5M
    Department of the Army· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Jan 12, 2026 – Feb 17, 2026· W912HP26CA002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OBAYASHI CMS JV$60M
    MINATO-KU, JPN · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
  2. KOONTZ ELECTRIC COMPANY, INCORPORATED$87M+255% in FY2026
    MORRILTON, AR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
  3. BERGER CUMMINS J V$35.5M−100% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.