Federal contractor · MORRILTON, AR
KOONTZ ELECTRIC COMPANY, INCORPORATED
KOONTZ ELECTRIC COMPANY, INCORPORATED received $59.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+255% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $212.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($59.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $59.5M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 76%
- UEI
- F8ESZW6XDMJ5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 8MFY2017
- 24.9MFY2018
- 14MFY2019
- 18.9MFY2020
- 26.5MFY2021
- 5.3MFY2022
- 27.5MFY2023
- 10.8MFY2024
- 16.8MFY2025
- 59.5MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$59.5M100%5 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$59.4M99.8%
- Equipment maintenance$90.3K0.2%
Where the work was performed
- Chippewa County, MI$45.4M76%
- Valley County, MT$14M24%
- Sumner County, TN$90.3K0.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition76%US 39% · $45.4M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions76%US 8.7% · $45.4M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Chippewa County, MI· Construction & real property· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· W911XK26CA009
- Department of the Army· Sumner County, TN· Equipment maintenance· Sep 27, 2023 – Mar 18, 2026· W912P523C0013
- Department of the Army· Valley County, MT· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W9128F26CA012
- Department of the Army· Valley County, MT· Construction & real property· Jun 6, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· W9128F24C0022
- Department of the Army· Russell County, KY· Construction & real property· Aug 5, 2024 – Nov 19, 2025· W912P524C0005
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
- FY2024: $6.5M paid out · $0 received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $284.4K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
2 companies · $6.5M reported
- RAPID CITY, SD · 1 subaward · Utility system construction
- BROWN ENGINEERS LLC$73.2KLITTLE ROCK, AR · 1 subaward · Utility system construction
Primes that pay it
1 company · $4M reported
- DEER PARK, WA · 2 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- CHANDLER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.$60.1M+2,325% in FY2026NINETY SIX, SC · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
- OBAYASHI CMS JV$60MMINATO-KU, JPN · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
- RELIABLE CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC$113.9M−93% in FY2026LOUISVILLE, KY · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.