Federal contractor · MORRILTON, AR

KOONTZ ELECTRIC COMPANY, INCORPORATED

KOONTZ ELECTRIC COMPANY, INCORPORATED received $59.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+255% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $212.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($59.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$59.5M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
76%
UEI
F8ESZW6XDMJ5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8MFY2017
  2. 24.9MFY2018
  3. 14MFY2019
  4. 18.9MFY2020
  5. 26.5MFY2021
  6. 5.3MFY2022
  7. 27.5MFY2023
  8. 10.8MFY2024
  9. 16.8MFY2025
  10. 59.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$59.4M99.8%
  2. Equipment maintenance$90.3K0.2%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition76%
    US 39% · $45.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions76%
    US 8.7% · $45.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Chippewa County, MI· Construction & real property· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· W911XK26CA009
  2. Department of the Army· Sumner County, TN· Equipment maintenance· Sep 27, 2023 – Mar 18, 2026· W912P523C0013
  3. Department of the Army· Valley County, MT· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W9128F26CA012
  4. Department of the Army· Valley County, MT· Construction & real property· Jun 6, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· W9128F24C0022
  5. Department of the Army· Russell County, KY· Construction & real property· Aug 5, 2024 – Nov 19, 2025· W912P524C0005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2024: $6.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $284.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $6.5M reported

  1. RAPID CITY, SD · 1 subaward · Utility system construction
  2. LITTLE ROCK, AR · 1 subaward · Utility system construction

Primes that pay it

1 company · $4M reported

  1. DEER PARK, WA · 2 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NINETY SIX, SC · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
  2. MINATO-KU, JPN · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction
  3. RELIABLE CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC$113.9M−93% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, KY · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Utility system construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.