Federal contractor · CALIFORNIA, MD

CHESAPEAKE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, CORP.

CHESAPEAKE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, CORP. received $22M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $260.3M. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($17.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$22M
New awards
11
Sole-source
95%
Single offer
5.2%
UEI
LAVARTMKKHT5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.1MFY2017
  2. 8.8MFY2018
  3. 13.1MFY2019
  4. 32.4MFY2020
  5. 26.2MFY2021
  6. 34.8MFY2022
  7. 38.9MFY2023
  8. 47.9MFY2024
  9. 33.1MFY2025
  10. 22MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Acquisition Service$17.3M79%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$4.7M21%
    7 awards
  3. Drug Enforcement Administration-$20.4K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$22M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$15.8M72%
  2. St. Mary's County, MD$1.7M7.8%
  3. Honolulu County, HI$1.5M6.9%
  4. Ventura County, CA$1.2M5.6%
  5. Kern County, CA$1.2M5.2%
  6. San Diego County, CA$567.6K2.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $22M
  • Sole-source awards95%
    US 30% · $20.8M
  • Single-offer competitions5.2%
    US 8.7% · $1.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$3.5M
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. CTI SBIR III CONTRACT NUMBER 47QFCA20C0021. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS.$96M
    Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· May 22, 2020 – Sep 24, 2026· 47QFCA20C0021
  2. CTI MAESTRO SBIR III AWARD PACKAGE.$89.2M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Aug 6, 2021 – Sep 28, 2026· 47QFCA21C0021
  3. SBIR PHASE III WSD SOFTWARE SUPPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES TASK ORDER 001$5.1M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· Sep 27, 2024 – Jan 8, 2026· M6890924F7634
  4. SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT/MODIFICATION, INTEGRATION, TEST, AND DOCUMENTATION IN SUPPORT OF THE DELIVERY OF MARINE CORPS ELECTRONIC WARFARE FAMILY OF SYSTEMS PRODUCTS AND CAPABILITIES$4.1M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Research & development· Mar 20, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· N6893625F0316
  5. SBIR 3 N151-021$1.7M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Research & development· Aug 6, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· N6893625F0437
  6. CONTINUE DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS UNDER SBIR TOPIC N151-021, FOR MODELING AND VISUALIZING THE COMPLEX TACTICAL EW ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING EW EFFECTS, THREAT RADARS, TACTICAL AIRCRAFT, AND OTHER TACTICALLY-RELEVANT INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF AEA MISSION.$1.6M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Research & development· Mar 19, 2026 – Apr 8, 2026· N6893626F5121
  7. SBIR PHASE 3 (N151-021) LABOR$1.1M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Research & development· May 20, 2025 – May 27, 2026· N6893625F0418
  8. SBIR 3 N151-021 TO 0002$618K
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Research & development· Sep 15, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· N6893625F0484

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $17.5M paid out · $208.3K received
  • FY2022: $6.2M paid out · $10.3M received
  • FY2023: $17M paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2024: $6.8M paid out · $15.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $43.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

45 companies · $47.6M reported

  1. IT MENTOR GROUP, INC.$14.6M
    POWAY, CA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. VERTOCOMM INC$6.9M
    WESTON, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. THAYERMAHAN, INC$4.6M
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $73.4M reported

  1. SMARTRONIX, LLC$53.3M
    HOLLYWOOD, MD · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$6.6M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$4.2M
    MCLEAN, VA · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MILE TWO LLC$63.7M−18% in FY2026
    DAYTON, OH · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. APTIMA INC$105M−0.3% in FY2026
    WOBURN, MA · 2 entities · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Scientific research and development services
  3. DEFENSE UNICORNS, INC.$114.2M−21% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.