Federal contractor · WOBURN, MA

APTIMA INC

APTIMA INC received $35.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 48 awards (−0.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $317.3M. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($27.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$35.2M
New awards
48
Sole-source
77%
Single offer
13%
UEI
K1GCPNNZKEN7
Parent company
APTIMA, INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $35.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. APTIMA INCWOBURN, MA · Family page
    $35.2M
  2. APTIMA INCARLINGTON, VA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 29.8MFY2017
  2. 18.4MFY2018
  3. 22.6MFY2019
  4. 39.8MFY2020
  5. 42.3MFY2021
  6. 30MFY2022
  7. 29.5MFY2023
  8. 34.6MFY2024
  9. 35.3MFY2025
  10. 35.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 18 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 4 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 11 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 3 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$30.4M86%
  2. Professional services$3.1M8.8%
  3. Education & social services$1.7M4.8%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition90%
    US 39% · $31.7M
  • Sole-source awards77%
    US 30% · $27.2M
  • Single-offer competitions13%
    US 8.8% · $4.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Greene County, OH· Research & development· Aug 12, 2024 – Sep 21, 2026· 47QFLA24F0112
  2. Federal Acquisition Service· Greene County, OH· Professional services· May 13, 2022 – Mar 30, 2026· 47QFLA22F0109
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· Arlington County, VA· Research & development· Jul 21, 2023 – Sep 2, 2026· 47QFLA23F0145
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· Greene County, OH· Research & development· Sep 24, 2019 – Nov 6, 2025· 47QFLA19F0221
  5. Federal Acquisition Service· Greene County, OH· Research & development· Sep 19, 2024 – Aug 13, 2026· 47QFLA24F0128
  6. Federal Acquisition Service· Greene County, OH· Research & development· May 7, 2021 – Nov 10, 2025· 47QFLA21F0107
  7. Federal Acquisition Service· King George County, VA· Research & development· Aug 27, 2020 – Apr 13, 2026· 47QFLA20F0249
  8. Department of the Air Force· Middlesex County, MA· Education & social services· Sep 10, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· FA251824P0006

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

APTIMA INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$1.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. -482FY2021
  2. 1.4MFY2024
  3. 299.2KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $43.3K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CAE USA INC.$43.3K100%
    ARLINGTON, TX · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $16.5M paid out · $4M received
  • FY2022: $20M paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2023: $1.6M paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2024: $2.7M paid out · $4.7M received
  • FY2025: $293.3K paid out · $50K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $43.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

49 companies · $41.1M reported

  1. BOULDER, CO · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ARLINGTON, TX · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. GROTON, CT · 8 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $15.7M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 3 subawards · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  2. WOBURN, MA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ANN ARBOR, MI · 3 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 15 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MILE TWO LLC$63.7M−18% in FY2026
    DAYTON, OH · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. CALIFORNIA, MD · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Scientific research and development services
  3. BEAST CODE LLC$54.8M+17% in FY2026
    FORT WALTON BEACH, FL · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.