Federal contractor · NORMAN, OK

CHICKASAW SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLC

CHICKASAW SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLC received $17M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−44% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $59.6M. Its largest customer was Departmental Offices ($7.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$17M
New awards
16
Sole-source
53%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G9ZUNB3U1JK1
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CHICKASAW BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $28.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CHICKASAW BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLCNORMAN, OK · Family page
    $11.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.2MFY2024
  2. 30.5MFY2025
  3. 17MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Departmental Offices$7.8M46%
    2 awards
  2. Defense Logistics Agency$3.6M21%
    2 awards
  3. Department of Energy$2.5M15%
    3 awards
  4. Defense Health Agency$1.9M11%
    3 awards
  5. Food and Drug Administration$1.1M6.3%
    2 awards
  6. Washington Headquarters Services$632.1K3.7%
    1 awards
  7. Indian Health Service$243.3K1.4%
    1 awards
  8. National Institutes of Health$25.1K0.1%
    1 awards
  9. Department of the Navy-$725.8K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$11.1M66%
  2. Professional services$3.6M21%
  3. Research & development$1.9M11%
  4. Equipment maintenance$383.3K2.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cleveland County, OK$13M77%
  2. Dale County, AL$1.9M11%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$1.6M9.3%
  4. Abroad$632.1K3.7%
  5. Anderson County, TN$545K3.2%
  6. Montgomery County, MD$25.1K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition53%
    US 39% · $8.9M
  • Sole-source awards53%
    US 30% · $8.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$3.6M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Energy$2.5M
    Department of Energy · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. FDA SAFETY INTAKE PROCESSING SYSTEMS (SIPS) PROGRAM$9.3M
    Food and Drug Administration· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2024 – Aug 7, 2026· 75F40124C00138
  2. HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM AND SUPPORT$7.2M
    Departmental Offices· Cleveland County, OK· IT & telecom· Nov 26, 2025 – Nov 26, 2025· 140D0426F0003
  3. SOFTWARE SECURITY, DEVELOPMENT, DOCUMENTATION SERVICES FOR THE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SYSTEMS (HITSS) AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE.$6.8M
    Departmental Offices· Cleveland County, OK· IT & telecom· Jan 14, 2025 – May 28, 2026· 140D0425F0001
  4. DEFENSE FUELS SUPPLY POINTS (DFSP) TASK ORDER YEAR 1$3.6M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Cleveland County, OK· Professional services· Dec 17, 2025 – Apr 1, 2026· SP470626F0006
  5. OCS DASHBOARD AND ANALYTICS SOLUTION SUPPORT.$3.1M
    Food and Drug Administration· Cleveland County, OK· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2024 – Sep 23, 2026· 75F40124P00495
  6. CYBER RESILIENCY PROGRAM$3.1M
    National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2025 – Jul 16, 2026· 75N98025P01738
  7. REQUISITION - FOLLOW-ON T&M CONTRACT FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES WITH CHICKASAW SERVICE SOLUTIONS (CSS)$2.8M
    Department of Energy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 29, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026· 89303025CCF000025
  8. DEFENSE FUELS SUPPLY POINT (DFSP) TRIBAL 8A CONTRACT$2.8M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Cleveland County, OK· Professional services· Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 11, 2025· SP470624C0002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $8.2M (5 subawards)

5 sub-recipients

  1. SYMVIONICS, INC.$3.7M45%
    ARCADIA, CA · 1 subaward
  2. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$2.8M34%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  3. SHB TECHNOLOGY, INC.$1.6M19%
    ELLICOTT CITY, MD · 1 subaward
  4. RED HERITAGE MEDIA LLC$165.1K2.0%
    ROCK HILL, SC · 1 subaward
  5. INTELLIC INTEGRATION LLC$72.5K0.9%
    ARLINGTON, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 49% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $4.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $8.2M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

11 companies · $13M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$5.5M
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SYMVIONICS, INC.$3.7M
    ARCADIA, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SHB TECHNOLOGY, INC.$1.6M
    ELLICOTT CITY, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $61.1M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$61.1M
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 30 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AKIMA SECURE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$30.3M+65% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 14% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Computer systems design and related servicesFood and Drug Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. VERSATECH/IMPYRIAN TECHNOLOGY NETWORK LLC$24.8M−28% in FY2026
    FULTON, MD · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  3. OCTO CONSULTING GROUP LLC$85.9M+5.4% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.