Federal contractor · CHUO-KU

CHUGAI TECHNOS CORPORATION

CHUGAI TECHNOS CORPORATION received $2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2M
New awards
18
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
12%
UEI
L1QGADKTW1M7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.6KFY2017
  2. 24.7KFY2018
  3. 24.6KFY2019
  4. 302.1KFY2020
  5. 369.3KFY2021
  6. 2.1MFY2022
  7. 1.8MFY2023
  8. 650.6KFY2024
  9. 1.7MFY2025
  10. 2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 13 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.8M93%
  2. Facilities & utilities$129.9K6.6%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.9M99%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition12%
    US 39% · $239.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions12%
    US 8.7% · $239.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Professional services· Aug 20, 2024 – Apr 1, 2026· W912HV24P0016
  2. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Jun 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· N4008426F4340
  3. Department of the Air Force· Facilities & utilities· Jul 27, 2022 – May 5, 2026· FA520922P0116
  4. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Jun 27, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· N4008425F0025
  5. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Mar 14, 2025 – May 14, 2026· N4008425F4251
  6. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Mar 19, 2026 – Mar 19, 2026· N4008426F9904
  7. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Jul 29, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· FA520922P0114
  8. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Oct 17, 2025 – Oct 17, 2025· N4008426F9900

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2M reported

  1. GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MULTI-MAC JV$3M−89% in FY2026
    YUMA, AZ · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TRIBOLOGIK CORP$3.2M−99% in FY2026
    HAMMOND, IN · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ALLIANCE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.$3.9M−28% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.