Federal contractor · BETHESDA, MD

COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.

COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC. received $316.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $102.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($316.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$316.1K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WLP5PYSE1FD6
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $337.2K in FY2026 together.

  1. COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.BETHESDA, MD · Family page
    $316.1K
  2. COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, LLC.BETHESDA, MD
    $21.1K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 346KFY2017
  2. 62.9MFY2019
  3. 11.4MFY2020
  4. 1.1MFY2021
  5. 23.2MFY2022
  6. 2.7MFY2023
  7. 523.1KFY2024
  8. 436.3KFY2025
  9. 316.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$316.1K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$316.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, MD$316.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SOCOM MSF HEC$23M
    Department of the Army· Montgomery County, MD· Construction & real property· Feb 4, 2022 – May 29, 2026· W912DR22C0009

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TEX/AM CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$18.7M+52% in FY2026
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
  2. KAPP-CON INCORPORATED$11M−98% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
  3. SPACESAVER SYSTEMS, INC.$19.5M−95% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.