Federal contractor · BETHESDA, MD

SPACESAVER SYSTEMS, INC.

SPACESAVER SYSTEMS, INC. received $383.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 19 awards (−95% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $43.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($349.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$383.1K
New awards
19
Sole-source
63%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UK98FPGUAKM1
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.6MFY2017
  2. 2.4MFY2018
  3. 4.7MFY2019
  4. 4.4MFY2020
  5. 2.3MFY2021
  6. 3.6MFY2022
  7. 4.8MFY2023
  8. 11.5MFY2024
  9. 7.6MFY2025
  10. 383.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$349.7K91%
    1 awards
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$108.5K28%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$82.7K22%
    4 awards
  4. Smithsonian Institution$43K11%
    8 awards
  5. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation$22.2K5.8%
    1 awards
  6. National Institutes of Health$16.8K4.4%
    1 awards
  7. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division$00.0%
    1 awards
  8. National Park Service$00.0%
    1 awards
  9. Drug Enforcement Administration-$239.8K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$329.1K56%
  2. Equipment maintenance$238K41%
  3. Professional services$17K2.9%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, MD$507.4K100%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$176.7K46%
  3. Prince William County, VA$7,8112.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition33%
    US 39% · $125.9K
  • Sole-source awards63%
    US 30% · $242.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$116.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Smithsonian Institution$227K
    Smithsonian Institution · 5 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$15.4K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. MSC POD 6 COLLECTIONS STORAGE EQUIPMENT$16.7M
    Smithsonian Institution· Prince George's County, MD· Construction & real property· Aug 25, 2023 – Feb 5, 2026· 33330223CF0010447
  2. WHHO STORAGE SOLUTIONS AND INSTALLATION WITHIN THE ESF FOR FY25 EAST WING MODERNIZATION$529.6K
    National Park Service· Prince George's County, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 9, 2025 – Aug 15, 2026· 140P3025F0029
  3. S2P2: COMPRESSED SHELVING: SOLICITATION: W911S226U2979$349.7K
    Department of the Army· Montgomery County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· May 7, 2026 – May 7, 2026· W911S226PA497
  4. SHELVING UPGRADE$108.5K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· 80NSSC26P0692
  5. NMAH MEZZ LIB. FIRE&SAFETY UPGRADE$97.9K
    Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 9, 2020 – Feb 10, 2026· 33317620P00445897
  6. SPACESAVER COMPACTOR MAINTENANCE FOR NHB AND MSC$97.3K
    Smithsonian Institution· Prince George's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· May 26, 2026 – May 26, 2026· 33321326P00536525
  7. ATF REQUIREMENT FOR ITS NEW DAYTON FIELD OFFICE SPACE. THE FURNITURE INCLUDES HIGH-DENSITY-STORAGE-SYSTEM IN ONE EVIDENCE VAULTS.$92.9K
    Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division· Montgomery County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 16, 2025 – Jul 9, 2026· 15A00025FAQA00177
  8. THE UPGRADE TO THE USMC BAND MUSIC LIBRARY SHELVING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE MANUFACTURER HAS DISCONTINUED SERVICE PARTS FOR THE CURRENT 21 YEAR OLD SYSTEM, MAKING THE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS OBSOLETE.$64.9K
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· M0026426P0027

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $137.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $79.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2M reported

  1. ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.$1.8M
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 3 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  2. M. C. DEAN, INC.$137.5K
    TYSONS, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 17 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TEX/AM CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$18.7M+52% in FY2026
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
  2. COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.$15.6M−98% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 2 entities · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
  3. KAPP-CON INCORPORATED$11M−98% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.