Federal contractor · SUFFOLK, VA

COMMAND POST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

COMMAND POST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $13.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+29% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $85.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($10.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.9M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WMKLFLX59Y11
Parent company
COMMAND POST TECHNOLOGIES INC
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 269KFY2017
  2. 5.7MFY2018
  3. 8.5MFY2019
  4. 8.5MFY2020
  5. 8.6MFY2021
  6. 8.4MFY2022
  7. 10.1MFY2023
  8. 10.7MFY2024
  9. 10.8MFY2025
  10. 13.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Information Systems Agency$10.8M78%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$2.6M19%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Army$500K3.6%
    1 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$11.3M81%
  2. Professional services$2.6M19%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Norfolk city, VA$10.8M78%
  2. Suffolk city, VA$2.6M19%
  3. Orange County, FL$500K3.6%
  4. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TECHNICAL OPERATIONS SUPPORT (TOS) TO 318 CYBER OPERATIONS GROUP (COG) OPERATING LOCATION BRAVO (OL-B) JOINT INFORMATION OPERATIONS RANGE (JIOR).$34.9M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Norfolk city, VA· IT & telecom· Jan 30, 2023 – May 4, 2026· HC102823F0110
  2. JOINT WARFIGHTING DIRECTORATE (JWD), FUTURES AND CONCEPTS DIVISION (FCD) JOINT CONCEPT SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE$9.9M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk city, VA· Professional services· Jan 10, 2023 – Dec 23, 2025· N0018923F3010
  3. NCRC EPOS NCRC-UNCLASSIFIED INTERN PROGRAM FOR NCRC$984K
    Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· IT & telecom· Apr 17, 2026 – Apr 17, 2026· W900KK26FA056
  4. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FG060

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.7M (3 subawards)

1 prime

  1. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$1.7M100%
    ATLANTA, GA · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $189.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $4.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $19.2M reported

  1. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$13.3M
    ATLANTA, GA · 23 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$5.9M
    MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. BOWHEAD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS, LLC$40.4K
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LIGHTGRID LLC$23.7M−63% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  2. IPKEYS TECHNOLOGIES LLC$33.9M−100% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, VA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ENGENIUS CONSULTING GROUP INC$35.7M−48% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • COMMAND POST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$180K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$661.9K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$67.5K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$180K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$180K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$234.4K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense16 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES16 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE16 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)4 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Other)3 reports
  5. Office of the Secretary of Defense3 reports
  6. Executive Office of the President (EOP)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CR Federal$457.5K
    11 reports
  2. CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC$144.4K
    2 reports
  3. Prewitt Group, P.A.$60K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PACs sponsored

  • COMMAND POST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.