Federal contractor · WILLIAMSPORT, PA

COMPU-GEN TECHNOLOGIES INC

COMPU-GEN TECHNOLOGIES INC received $22.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.8M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($17.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$22.1K
New awards
3
Sole-source
22%
Single offer
78%
UEI
Q6VTJ4RJQGF4
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 257.6KFY2018
  3. 648.4KFY2019
  4. 284.7KFY2020
  5. 248.2KFY2021
  6. 69.6KFY2022
  7. 197KFY2023
  8. 38.6KFY2024
  9. 47.2KFY2025
  10. 22.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$22.1K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $22.1K
  • Sole-source awards22%
    US 30% · $4,947
  • Single-offer competitions78%
    US 8.8% · $17.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Lycoming County, PA· IT & telecom· May 11, 2026 – May 11, 2026· 75N98026F00132
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Boulder County, CO· IT & telecom· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· 1305M326P0132
  3. National Institutes of Health· Lycoming County, PA· IT & telecom· Apr 16, 2026 – May 6, 2026· 75N98026F00089

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $100.3K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $26K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $294.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $355K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $94.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $100.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $870.8K reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANASSAS, VA · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services
  2. CHICAGO, IL · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.