Federal contractor · JOHNSTOWN, PA

CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP

CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP received $37.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−2.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $374.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($21.9M). It also received $249.9K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$37.2M
New awards
15
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
18%
UEI
KNW6WWRKELJ3
Other than small businessNonprofit

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $44M in FY2026 together.

  1. CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPJOHNSTOWN, PA · Family page
    $37.2M
  2. $6.8M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 26.5MFY2017
  2. 30.7MFY2018
  3. 27.9MFY2019
  4. 31.5MFY2020
  5. 40.9MFY2021
  6. 47.8MFY2022
  7. 48.3MFY2023
  8. 45.9MFY2024
  9. 38.2MFY2025
  10. 37.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$28.2M76%
  2. Research & development$8.4M23%
  3. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$564.3K1.5%

Where the work was performed

  1. United States$13.3M36%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition18%
    US 39% · $6.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions18%
    US 8.8% · $6.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 23, 2023 – Sep 23, 2026· 47QFHA23F0010
  2. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 25, 2023 – Apr 16, 2026· M9549423F0013
  3. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Sep 12, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· M9549425F5008
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Research & development· Feb 17, 2022 – Jan 29, 2026· SP470122C0025
  5. Department of the Air Force· Cambria County, PA· Research & development· Aug 2, 2022 – Jun 9, 2026· FA865022C5600
  6. Department of the Air Force· Cambria County, PA· Research & development· Dec 4, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· FA239426CB003
  7. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Mar 25, 2026 – Mar 25, 2026· M9549426F5003
  8. Department of the Air Force· Cambria County, PA· Professional services· Sep 11, 2025 – Apr 14, 2026· FA714625C0057

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP received $249.9K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), −0% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research ($249.9K).

Assistance · FY2026
$249.9K
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2023
$5.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 4.8MFY2023
  2. 0FY2024
  3. 250KFY2025
  4. 249.9KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$249.9K100%

Top programs

  1. 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research$249.9K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· Dec 20, 2024 – Aug 18, 2026· W911NF2520034

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2023–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $38.3M (19 subawards)

13 sub-recipients

  1. MC LEAN, VA · 2 subawards
  2. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards
  4. FAIRBANKS, AK · 1 subaward
  5. ARC IMPACT ACQUISITION CORPORATION$2.1M5.5%
    BURLINGTON, MA · 1 subaward
  6. LONG BEACH, CA · 1 subaward
  7. INTELLIGENT DATA SOLUTIONS INC.$1.1M2.8%
    ROSEVILLE, CA · 1 subaward
  8. SKJ CONSULTING INC$939.9K2.5%
    GRAND JUNCTION, CO · 1 subaward
  9. RESTON, VA · 4 subawards
  10. OSCEOLA INC$554.5K1.4%
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3M (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $3.2M (1 subaward)

2 primes

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 103% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $71.3M paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2022: $70.1M paid out · $937K received
  • FY2023: $95M paid out · $8.2M received
  • FY2024: $42.2M paid out · $19.5M received
  • FY2025: $32.2M paid out · $15.5M received
  • FY2026: $38.3M paid out · $6.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

63 companies · $349.2M reported

  1. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 12 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

18 companies · $56.8M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 6 subawards
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 13 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BETHESDA, MD · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 27 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INNOVASYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC$85.3M−99% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BELTSVILLE, MD · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SCHMIDT-PRIME GROUP, LLC$54.6M−47% in FY2026
    PENSACOLA, FL · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Concurrent Technologies CorporationAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$160K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$550K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$150K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$160K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$160K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$80K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Brody Group L.L.C. Public Affairs$350K
    14 reports
  2. PRASAM$200K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.